Fundamentalism and Late Modernity: use of digital media and the production of uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2025.n44.7646Keywords:
fundamentalism , speeches, media, uncertainty, late modernityAbstract
This article aims to examine the relationship between the rise of fundamentalist discourses, the use of two digital communication methods, and the production of uncertainty. This production of uncertainty emerges as a communication and dissemination strategy, not of truths that bring a sense of security, but of post-truths and fake news. Instead of producing enlightenment, it generates confusion, alienation, prejudice, and violence. These ideas were disseminated through my fingers in Late Modernity, which becomes paradoxical in relation to the Enlightenment promise of human liberation through technological evolution, since, instead of promoting or achieving it, they seem to be consciously imprisoning us. This debate is justified because it has profoundly influenced human social organization, in addition to producing the polarization and fragmentation of society, reviving fundamentalist discourses that seemed already forgotten. This exploratory and theoretical reflection seeks to support this debate, drawing on authors of media theory such as Marshall McLuhan and Eugênio Rondini Trivinho, along with sociology authors such as Zygmunt Bauman, Hartmut Rosa, and Eliana Sanches de Frias. In addition to questioning the relationship between the media, the sense of uncertainty, and the revival and increased dissemination of fundamentalist discourses, another important issue is expanding the concept of fundamentalism, beyond religious discourses.
Downloads
References
Agamben, G. (2019). Signatura rerum. Boitempo.
Baitello, N. (2015). A massa sem corpo, o corpo sem massa, a massa sem massa, o corpo sem corpo: As redes sociais como ambientes de ausência (e fundamentalismos). In M. I. V. de Lopes & M. M. K. Kunsch (Orgs.), Comunicação, cultura e mídias sociais (pp. 17-22). São Paulo: ECA-USP.
Bauman, Z. (1998). O mal-estar da pós-modernidade. Zahar.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Modernidade líquida. Zahar.
De Paula, L., Silva, T., & Blanco, Y. (2018). Pós-verdade e fontes de informação: um estudo sobre fake news. Revista Conhecimento em Ação, 3(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.47681/rca.v3i1.16764
Dreher. M. N. (2005). O fundamentalismo religioso e sua importância na resolução ou agravamento do conflito palestino-israelense. Revista Teocomunicação, 35(149), 553-567.
Dugnani, P. (2022). Meios de comunicação e aldeia global: globalização, desglobalização e interculturalidade. ECCOM, 13(26), 173-183.
Dugnani, P. (2024). Método científico y paradigmas posmodernos: reflexión sobre un método arqueológico de análisis de la comunicación. Prometeica. Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias, 29, 138-148. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2024.29.15193
Foucault, M. (1990). As palavras e as coisas. Martins Fontes.
Foucault, M. (2012). A arqueologia do saber. Forense Universitária.
Han, B. (2015). Sociedade do cansaço. Vozes.
Martino, L. M. S. (2012). A religião midiatizada nas fronteiras entre público e privado: uma abordagem teórico-crítica. Revista Ciberlegenda, 26(1), 111-122.
Martino, L. M. S. (2016, 19 de septiembre). Quem somos nós? | Zygmunt Bauman por Luís Mauro Sá Martino [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exRPweoBDfc&t=2659s
McLuhan, M. (2016). Os meios de comunicação como extensões do homem. Cultrix.
Rosa, H. (2022). Aceleração e alienação. Vozes.
Rosa. H. (2019). Aceleração a transformação das estruturas temporais na modernidade. Unesp.
Sanches de Frias, E. (2021). Inteligencia artificial, desinformación y populismo digital: cómo las plataformas digitales impulsan los movimientos de extrema derecha [Inteligência artificial, desinformação e populismo digital: como as plataformas digitais impulsionam os movimentos de direita extrema]. Razón y Palabra, 25(112), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v25i112.1854
Trivinho, E. (2024). Infonegócios endofascistas: razões políticas e sociais para a regulamentação das plataformas digitais no Brasil. Revista Eco-Pós, 27(1), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-ps.v27i1.28196
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All of the works published are licensed under a CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution license. (updated on March 1st 2021)
The content of the journal may be shared in any material or format. The content may be adapted, contributed upon and transformed. Both possibilities are only permitted in so far as they complete the following conditions:
- Attribution: Credit must be given where it is due, a link to the license must be provided and changes, if made, must be indicated. This should be done in the manner deemed appropriate, without suggesting that the licensor promotes you or your use of the material.
Ownership rights
The patrimonial rights for Contratexto are published under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 license, allowing authors to keep the patrimonial rights to their work without restrictions.
If a work published in Contratexto were to be copied, distributed, spread, or any other activities contemplated in the aforementioned license, the author(s) and the journal must be mentioned visibly and expressly.
Self-archive
This journal allows and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.













