Mechanism-based explanations and process tracing in communication: fundamentals and advantages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2024.n41.6363Keywords:
media theory, process tracing, methodology, communicationAbstract
Bunge (1997) argues that a good scientific explanation should detail the mechanisms that lead from causes to effects. In recent decades, this type of explanation has been incorporated into the dominant paradigms in sociology and political science, where it has achieved both theoretical and methodological advances, above all through the process tracing technique. In contrast, in communication there continues to be an almost exclusive dominance of theories and research using interpretive or variance methods. This paper argues that advances in the mechanism paradigm in other disciplines can be exploited by researchers in the field of communication who wish to study both classical issues in the discipline and social processes in which communication is involved as a relevant causal factor. The main definitions of the paradigm and the most important recommendations of the process tracing methodology are presented. Furthermore, Elizalde’s (2006) theory of the spiral of dissent is used to exemplify how these concepts and procedures can be empirically applied to a theory of the communication discipline.
Downloads
References
Adut, A. (2012). A Theory of the Public Sphere. Sociological Theory, 30(4), 238-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112467012
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10072208
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2001). La construcción social de la realidad. Amorrortu Editores.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movement: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Bennet, A. (2008). Process Tracing: a Bayesian Perspective. En J. M. Box-Steffensmeir, H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 702-720). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.001.0001
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing: from philosophical roots to best practices. En A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing. From metaphor to analytic tool (pp. 3-39). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Box-Steffensmeier, J., Brady, H., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.001.0001
Boykoff, J. (2006). The Suppression of Dissent. How the State and Mass Media Squelch USAmerican Social Movements. Routledge.
Bunge, M. (1997). Mechanism and Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(4), 410-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319702700402
Bunge, M. (2003). Emergencia y convergencia. Novedad cualitativa y unidad del conocimiento. Gedisa.
Cannata, J. P. (2016, 28-30 de julio). Escándalos, discurso público y agendas sensibles emergentes [Ponencia]. V Congreso Internacional de ALICE, Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. University of Notre Dame Press.
Ekström, M., & Johansson, B. (2008). Talk scandals. Media, Culture & Society, 30(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084350
Elizalde, L. (2014). La comunicación como “mecanismo social”. Fundamentos teóricos para el desarrollo de un modelo aplicado de comunicación humana. En D. Fernández Pedemonte (Coord.), Comunicación aplicada. Teoría y método (pp. 80-123). Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones.
Elizalde, L. (2006). La comunicación gubernamental: problemas y soluciones estratégicas. En L. Elizalde, D. Fernandez Pedemonte & M. Riorda (Eds.), La construcción del consenso. Gestión de la comunicación gubernamental (pp. 145-249). La Crujía.
Faletti, T., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331724
Fitz Herbert, A. (2019). Conflictos ambientalistas populares [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Austral]. Repositorio Institucional, Universidad Austral.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press.
Greyser, S. (2009). Corporate brand reputation and brand crisis management. Management Decision, 47(4), 590-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910959431
Hedström, P. (1994). Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5), 1157-1179. https://doi.org/10.1086/230408
Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Process tracing the effects of ideas. En A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process Tracing. From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (pp. 41-73). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1960). Mass media, popular taste, and organized social action. En W. Schramm (Ed.), Mass communications (2.a ed., pp. 492-512). University of Illinois Press.
Mahoney, J. (2001). Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method. Sociological Forum, 16(3), 575-593.
Mahoney, J. (2012). The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112437709
Mann, M. (1986). The Sources of Social Power. Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Merton, R. K. (2002). Teoría y estructura sociales (4.a ed.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. Poole, M. S. (2013). On the Study of Process in Communication Research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36, 371-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23 808985.2013.11679140
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Wiley-Blackwell. Tilly, C. (2001). Mechanisms in Political Processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21
Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2006). It depends. En C. Tilly & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (pp. 3-32). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.001.0001
Tilly, C. & Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious Politics. Paradigm Publishers. Verón, E. (2015). Teoría de la mediatización: una perspectiva semio-antropológica. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 20, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CIYC.2015.v20.50682
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. (1981). Teoría de la comunicación humana: interacciones, patologías y paradojas (11.a ed.). Herder. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k0tj
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All of the works published are licensed under a CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution license. (updated on March 1st 2021)
The content of the journal may be shared in any material or format. The content may be adapted, contributed upon and transformed. Both possibilities are only permitted in so far as they complete the following conditions:
- Attribution: Credit must be given where it is due, a link to the license must be provided and changes, if made, must be indicated. This should be done in the manner deemed appropriate, without suggesting that the licensor promotes you or your use of the material.
Ownership rights
The patrimonial rights for Contratexto are published under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 license, allowing authors to keep the patrimonial rights to their work without restrictions.
If a work published in Contratexto were to be copied, distributed, spread, or any other activities contemplated in the aforementioned license, the author(s) and the journal must be mentioned visibly and expressly.
Self-archive
This journal allows and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
