Use and influence of web analytics in news production: a case study of a peruvian digital media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2021.n035.4958Keywords:
audience, web analytics, digital journalism, gatekeepingAbstract
The digital age has added a key element in news production: Web analytics, which allows understanding the audience through a series of indicators and metrics. The purpose of this research is to describe the use and influence of Web analytics in news production by publishers and editors of the RPP Noticias website, the main Peruvian radio station. Based on twelve in-depth interviews, the perceptions and experiences of journalists regarding this audience measurement tool are recorded. The research confirmed that Web analytics has a level of influence on the content selected by editors and on the location of the news on the website cover page. Furthermore, this finding suggests that publishers present mixed views: those dealing with hard topics (politics, public administration, international issues) defend their own journalistic criteria, while those who deal with soft topics (celebrities, sports and entertainment) point to a balance between their judgment and their audience’s preferences.
Downloads
References
Anderson, C. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism, 12(5), 550-566.88
Boczkowski, P. (2006). Digitalizar las noticias: innovación en los diarios online. Manantial.
Boczkowski, P., y Peer, L. (2011). The choice gap: the divergent online news preferences of journalists and consumers. Journal of Communication, 61, 857-876.
Compañía Peruana de Estudios de Mercado y Opinión Pública (CPI). (2017). Inversión publicitaria. https://www.cpi.pe/images/upload/paginaweb/archivo/26/mr_inversion_publicitaria_201801.pdf
Compañía Peruana de Estudios de Mercado y Opinión Pública (CPI). (2018). Inversión publicitaria. https://www.cpi.pe/images/upload/paginaweb/archivo/26/mr_inversion_publicitaria_2019.pdf
Compañía Peruana de Estudios de Mercado y Opinión Pública (CPI). (2018). Audiencias radiales 2018: resumen anual. https://www.cpi.pe/images/upload/paginaweb/archivo/26/mr_resumen_anual_radial_201903.pdf
Compañía Peruana de Estudios de Mercado y Opinión Pública (CPI). (2019). Inversión publicitaria. https://www.cpi.pe/images/upload/paginaweb/archivo/26/mr_inversion_publicitaria_2019_n01_2020_a.pdf
De Ita, M. C. (17 de julio del 2019). La transformación digital llegó a los medios de comunicación. Conexión ESAN. https://www.esan.edu.pe/conexion/actualidad/2019/07/17/la-transformacion-digital-llego-a-los-medios-de-comunicacion/
Ferrer-Conill, R., y Tandoc, E. (2018). The audience-oriented editor: making sense of the audience in the newsroom. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 436-453.
Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news: a study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. Vintage.
Hanusch, F. (2016). Web analytics and the functional differentiation of journalism cultures: individual, organizational and platform-specific influences on newswork. Information, Communication & Society, 20(10), 1571-1586.
Hanusch, F., y Tandoc, E. (2017). Comments, analytics, and social media: the impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation. Journalism, 20(6), 695-713.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., y Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación (5.a ed.). McGraw Hill.
Ipsos. (2017). Perú 2017, de la informalidad a la modernidad. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2017-02/Ipsos_Flair_Peru_0.pdf
Kormelink, T. G., y Meijer, I. C. (2018). What clicks actually mean: exploring digital news user practices. Journalism, 19(5), 668-683.
Kvale, S. (2008). Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Morata.
Lamot, K., y Paulussen, S. (2019). Six uses of analytics: digital editors’ perceptions of audience analytics in the newsroom. Journalism Practice, 14(3), 358-373.
Lamot, K., y Van Aelst, P. (2019). Beaten by Chartbeat? An experimental study on the effect of real-time audience analytics on journalists’ news judgment. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 477-493.
Lee, A., y Chyi, H. I. (2014). When newsworthy is not noteworthy: examining the value of news from the audience’s perspective. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 807-820.
Lee, A., Lewis, S., y Powers, M. (2012). Audience clicks and news placement. A study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research, 41(4), 505-530.
Lowrey, W., y Woo, C. W. (2010). The news organization in uncertain times: business or institution? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(1), 41-61.
Mazzone Vivas, D. (2018). De los medios a las plataformas. Del control del gatekeeping a la conversación descontrolada. Contratexto, (029), 121-143.
McElroy, B. (2019). Experimenting with interaction: TV news efforts to invite audiences into the broadcast and their effects on gatekeeping. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25(3), 449-465.
MacGregor, P. (2007). Tracking the online audience: metric data start a subtle revolution. Journalism Studies, 8(2), 280-298.
Nelson, J., y Tandoc, E. (2018). Doing “well” or doing “good”: what audience analytics reveal about journalism’s competing goals. Journalism Studies, 20(13), 1960-1976.
Nguyen, A. (2013). Online news audiences: the challenges of web metrics. En S. Allan y K. Fowler-Watt (Eds.), Journalism: new challenges (pp. 146-161). Centre for Journalism & Communication Research (CJCR), Bournemouth University.
Ojo Público. (2016). Dueños de la noticia. El poder económico detrás de los medios. https://duenosdelanoticia.ojo-publico.com/articulo/mom-peru-una-base-de-datos-para-conocer-a-los-duenos-de-los-medios/
Retegui, L. (2020). Métricas y cuantificación del rendimiento individual de los periodistas: un estudio en el interior de una sala de redacción. Austral Comunicación, 9(1), 45-67.
Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., y Legnante, G. (2012). Hard and soft news: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221-239
Schultz, I. (2007) The journalistic gut feeling: journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice, 1(2), 190-207.
Shoemaker, P., Eichholz, M., Kim, E., y Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233-246.
Shoemaker, P., y Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: theories of influences on mass media content. Longman.
Shoemaker, P., Vos, T., y Reese, S. (2009). Journalist as gatekeepers. En K. Wahl-Jorgensen y T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 73-87). Routledge.
Singer, J. (2014). User-generated visibility: secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55-73.
Suenzo, F., Boczkowski, P., y Mitchelstein, E. (2020). La crisis de la prensa escrita: una revisión bibliográfica para repensarla desde Latinoamérica. Cuadernos.info, (47), 1-25.
Tandoc, E. (2014). Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society, 16(4), 559-575.
Tandoc, E. (2015). Why web analytics click: factors affecting the ways journalists use audience metrics. Journalism Studies, 16(6), 782-799.
Usher, N. (2013). Al Jazeera English Online: understanding web metrics and news production when a quantified audience is not a commodified audience. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 335-351.
Valles, M. (1999). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Síntesis.
Vu, H. (2013). The online audience as gatekeeper: the influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism, 15(8), 1094-1110.
Web Analytics Association. (2008). Web analytics definitions. Autor.
White, D. (1950). The “gate keeper”: a case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(3), 383-390.
Zamith, R. (2018). Quantified audiences in news production: a synthesis and research agenda. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 418-435.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All of the works published are licensed under a CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution license. (updated on March 1st 2021)
The content of the journal may be shared in any material or format. The content may be adapted, contributed upon and transformed. Both possibilities are only permitted in so far as they complete the following conditions:
- Attribution: Credit must be given where it is due, a link to the license must be provided and changes, if made, must be indicated. This should be done in the manner deemed appropriate, without suggesting that the licensor promotes you or your use of the material.
Ownership rights
The patrimonial rights for Contratexto are published under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 license, allowing authors to keep the patrimonial rights to their work without restrictions.
If a work published in Contratexto were to be copied, distributed, spread, or any other activities contemplated in the aforementioned license, the author(s) and the journal must be mentioned visibly and expressly.
Self-archive
This journal allows and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
