Trends and developments in computational design and nature-based approaches in architecture: a bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/limaq2026.n017.7842Keywords:
computational design, biomimicry, parametric design, sustainable architecture, bibliometrics, interdisciplinary collaboration, advanced technologies, architectural innovationAbstract
Architectural design has undergone a substantial shift over the past two decades, driven by the adoption of computational technologies and the integration of nature- inspired principles. This bibliometric study examines 415 articles indexed in the Web of Science database, identifying key patterns across computational, parametric, generative, and biomimetic design research. The findings show a marked increase in publications since 2015, suggesting a growing effort to align sustainability goals with advanced technological methods. However, the effective implementation of this alignment varies depending on project type and geographic context, and in many cases still lacks robust empirical validation.
.
Downloads
References
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language. Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
As, I., Pal, S., & Basu, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence in architecture: Generating conceptual design via deep learning. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 16(4), 306-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077118800982
Avinç, G. M., & Selçuk, S. A. (2020). Bio-informed research in the discipline of architecture: A bibliometric analysis. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 51(2), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.16060
Badarnah, L., & Kadri, U. (2015). A methodology for generation of biomimetic design concepts. Architectural Science Review, 58(2), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2014.922458
Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry. Innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow.
Burry, M. (2003). Blurring the lines: An exploration of current CAD/CAM techniques, parametric design and rapid prototyping in the Sagrada Família. Architectural Design, 73(5), 110-118.
Burry, M. (2016). Antoni Gaudi and Frei Otto: Essential precursors to the parametricism manifesto. Architectural Design, 86(2), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2021
Caetano, I., Santos, L., & Leitão, A. (2020). Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative and algorithmic design. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(2), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.008
Carvalho, J. P., Alecrim, I., Bragança, L., & Mateus, R. (2020). Integrating BIM-based LCA and building sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 12(18), 7468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187468
Estévez, A. (2020). Sustainable living? Biodigital future! En J. A. Stagner & D. S-K. Ting (Eds.), Sustaining Resources for Tomorrow (pp. 137-162). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27676-8_8
Eversmann, P., Heise, J., Böhm, S., Ochs, J., & Akbar, Z. (2021). Additive timber manufacturing: A novel, wood-based filament and its additive robotic fabrication techniques for large-scale, material-efficient construction. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 9(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0356
Gamage, A., & Hyde, R. (2012). A model based on Biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design. Architectural Science Review, 55(3), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2012.709406
Gu, N., & London, K. (2010). Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 988-999.
Gürsel Dino, I. (2012). Creative design exploration by parametric generative systems in architecture. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 29(1), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2012.1.12
Kolarevic, B. (Ed.). (2003). Architecture in the digital age. Design and manufacturing. Taylor & Francis.
Leach, N. (2009). Digital morphogenesis. Architectural Design, 79(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.806
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203
Menges, A. (2012). Material resourcefulness: Activating material information in computational design. Architectural Design, 82(2), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1377
Menges, A., & Knippers, J. (2015). Fibrous tectonics. Architectural Design, 85(5), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1952
Menges, A., & Reichert, S. (2012). Material capacity: Embedded responsiveness. Architectural Design, 82(2), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1379
Park, J. (2011). BIM-based parametric design methodology for modernized Korean traditional buildings. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 10(2), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.10.327
Pedersen Zari, M. (2010). Biomimetic design for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Architectural Science Review, 53(2), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.0065
Shea, K. (2003). Generative design: Blurring the lines between architect, engineer and computer. Architectural Design, 73(4), 116-121.
Solano López, E., Castellanos Quintero, S., López Rodríguez del Rey, M., & Hernández Fernández, J. (2009). La bibliometría: una herramienta eficaz para evaluar la actividad científica postgraduada. MediSur, 7(4), 59-62. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3038055
Tibbits, S. (2012). Design for self-assembly. Architectural Design, 82(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1381
Vincent, J. (2009). Biomimetic patterns in architectural design. Architectural Design, 79(6), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.982
Woodbury, R. (2010). Elements of Parametric Design. Routledge.
.jpg)
