Proposed model improvement for “mypes” software producers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/interfases2017.n10.1769Keywords:
Quality assurance, process improvement, software producing mypesAbstract
This work is based on the results of the research “Analysis of the use of software quality models: a proposal to improve processes in the ‘mypes’ producing software in Lima”, which was supported by the Institute of Scientific Research of the University of Lima. The study characterized “mypes” and showed that they do not have an adequate use of software quality models, both in their processes and products. In addition, these companies recognized that they have problems in their processes and the need to improve them. It was therefore proposed to develop a further research setting a suitable and sustainable process improvement model for each category of “mype”, based on an in-depth analysis of existing quality models, that could be applied throughout the entire software lifecycle: from the establishment of requirements to the quality tests.
Downloads
References
Amable, M. (2015). Propuesta de un proceso de investigación cuantitativa. Aplicación en la caracterización de las mypes productoras de software. Interfases, 8, 71-92. Recuperado de https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Interfases/article/download/574/541
Amable, M., Millones, R., y Checa, R. (2015). Calidad de software en las mypes productoras de software en Lima. En Ugaz, J., Gonzales, S., y Torres, C. (Eds.), VII Congreso Internacional de Computación y Telecomunicaciones. Memoria COMTEL 2015 (133-139). Lima, Perú: Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Fondo Editorial. Recuperado de http://www.comtel.pe/memoriacomtel/COMTEL2015.pdf
Barrios, M. (abril de 2010). Modelo de negocio. Asunción: Universidad Americana. Recuperado de http://marktur.travel/uploads/secciones_contenido/62/62-1323280539.pdf
Galván, S., Mora, M., O’Connor, R., Acosta, F., y Álvarez, F. (2015). A Compliance Analysis of Agile Methodologies with the ISO/IEC 29110 Project Management Process. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 188-195. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.480
García, J., Mitre, H., De Amescua, A., y Velasco, M. (2010). Integration of strategic management, process improvement and quantitative measurement for managing the competitiveness of software engineering organizations. Software Quality Journal, 18(3), 341-359. DOI:10.1007/s11219-010-9094-7
Garzás, J., Pino, F., Piattini, M., y Fernández, C. (2013). A maturity model for the Spanish software
industry based on ISO standards. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35(6), 616-628. DOI:10.1016/j.csi.2013.04.002
ISO / IEC. (2011). ISO/IEC TR 29110-3:2011. Software engineering - Lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) - Part 3: Assessment guide.
Kitchenham, B., y Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01 (Vol. 2). Durham, Inglaterra. Recuperado de https://ees.elsevier.com/infsof/img/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
Mitre, H., De Amescua, A., García, J., y Velasco, P. (2014). Designing a Strategic Measurement Program for Software Engineering Organizations: Discovering Difficulties and Problems. Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología, 15(2), 253–269. DOI: 10.1016/S1405-7743(14)72215-2
Moreno, E., Sánchez, M., Colomo, R., y De Amescua, A. (2014). Towards Measuring the Impact of the ISO/IEC 29110 Standard: A Systematic Review. En Barafort, B., O’Connor, R., Poth, A. y Messnarz, R. (Eds.), Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (1-12). Berlín, Alemania: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_1
Niazi, M., Babar, M., y Verner, J. (2010). Software Process Improvement barriers: A cross-cultural comparison. En Information and Software Technology, 52(11), 1204–1216. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.06.005
Osterwalder, A., y Pigneur, Y. (2011). Generación de modelos de negocio: Un manual para visionarios, revolucionarios y retadores. Barcelona, España: Deusto.
Trujillo, Y., Febles, A., y León, G. (2014). Modelo para valorar las organizaciones al iniciar la mejora de procesos de software. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 22(3), 412-420. DOI:10.4067/S0718-33052014000300011
Von Wangenheim, C., Rossa, J., Salviano, C., y Von Wangenheim, A. (2010). Systematic Literature Review of Software Process Capability/Maturity Models. En 10th International SPICE Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, SPICE 2010. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jean_Hauck/publication/228738042_Systematic_Literature_Review_of_Software_Process_CapabilityMaturity_Models/links/5542922e0cf24107d39472e5/Systematic-Literature-Review-of-Software-Process-Capability-MaturityModels.pdf
Wasson, C. (2015). System Engineering Analysis, Design, and Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices (2.a Ed.). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Zarour, M., Abran, A., Desharnais, J., y Alarifi, A. (2015). An investigation into the best practices for the successful design and implementation of lightweight software process assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 101, 180-192. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.04
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Last updated 03/05/21
