Information disorder about COVID-19 vaccines: multimodal narratives spread on social media by skeptics in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2025.n44.7887Keywords:
vaccines, information disorde, multimodal narrative , social media , disinformationAbstract
This article analyzes the information disorder about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Colombia during the rollout of the National Vaccination Plan (February 2021-April 2022) and the months following its completion (May-December 2022). Based on a digital ethnography of the collective Our Truth on Twitter (X) and Instagram, and through multimodal analysis of their posts, this study identifies the deception techniques and narrative orientations that Colombian anti-vaccine activists deployed in their communication activities. The results show that multimodal narratives about vaccine safety and effectiveness are geared toward manipulating scientific discourse, constructing an anti-vaccine identity, and exacerbating anti-government sentiments. The vulnerabilities of the media ecosystem and the Colombian political context were exploited both to confuse and disorient the public, “muddying the waters,” and to make visible the anti-vaccine movement and mobilize citizens skeptical of vaccination in public spaces.
Downloads
References
Adami, E. (2016). Multimodality. En O. García, N. Flores & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 451-472). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212896.013.23
Baker, S. A., & Walsh, M. J. (2024). “Memes save lives”: Stigma and the production of antivaccination memes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 10(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224729
Chara, M. E., Monteza Facho, B., Bartolo-Marchena, M., & Medina Ibáñez, A. (2024). Desinformación sobre las vacunas contra la COVID-19 a través de la red social Facebook. Comuni@cción, 15(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.15.2.916
Chaparro, P., & Castañeda, C. (2021). El desinterés en recibir la vacuna contra el coronavirus en población de 23 ciudades colombianas, julio a diciembre de 2020. Revista Gerencia y Políticas de Salud, 20, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps20.drvc
Durán, P., & Lawrence, T. (2021, 20 de diciembre). Constitutional vote in Chile targeted by coordinated hashtag campaign before election. The Media Manipulation Case Book. https://casebook-static.pages.dev/case-studies/constitutional-vote-chile-targeted-coordinated-hashtag-campaign-election
Edelsztein, V., & Cormick, C. (2023). Análisis del movimiento antivacunas en Twitter: una perspectiva latinoamericana. JComAL. Journal of Science Communication América Latina, 6(2), A09. https://doi.org/10.22323/3.06020209
García-Marín, D., & Merino-Ortego, M. (2022). Desinformación anticientífica sobre la COVID-19 difundida en Twitter en Hispanoamérica. Cuadernos.info, (52), 24-46. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0719-367X2022000200024&script=sci_abstract
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet. Yale University Press.
Herrera-Peco, I., Jiménez-Gómez B, Romero Magdalena C. S., Deudero, J. J., García-Puente, M., Benítez, E., & Ruiz, C. (2021). Antivaccine movement and COVID-19 negationism: A content analysis of spanish-written messages on Twitter. Vaccines, 9(6), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060656
Hong, T., Tang, Z., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Wu, J., & Wijaya, D. (2023). Effects of #coronavirus content moderation on misinformation and anti-Asian hate on Instagram. New Media & Society, 27(2), 931-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231187529
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638027
Kerr, J., Panagopoulos, C., & Van der Linden, S. (2021). Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 110892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892
Kotseva B, Vianini, I., Nikolaidis, N., Faggiani, N., Potapova, K., Gasparro, C., Steiner, Y., Scornavacche, J., Jacquet, G., Dragu, V., Della Rocca, L., Bucci, S., Podavini, A., Verile, M., & Linge, J. P. (2023). Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives—A 3-year study. PLoS One, 18(11), e0291423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291423
Larrondo-Ureta, A., Fernández, S. P., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2021). Desinformación, vacunas y COVID-19. Análisis de la infodemia y la conversación digital en Twitter. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (79), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1504
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (s. f.). Rezago en el registro de dosis aplicadas contra COVID-19 en PAIWEB. https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNThmZTJmZWYtOWFhMy00OGE1LWFiNDAtMTJmYjM0NDA5NGY2IiwidCI6ImJmYjdlMTNhLTdmYjctNDAxNi04MzBjLWQzNzE2ZThkZDhiOCJ9
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2022, 28 de enero). Minsalud fija nuevas metas del Plan Nacional de Vacunación contra el COVID-19. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Paginas/Minsalud-fijo-nuevas-metas-del-Plan-Nacional-de-Vacunacion-contra-el-covid-19.aspx
Moran, R., Swan, A., & Agajanian, T. (2024). Vaccine misinformation for profit: Conspiratorial wellness influencers and the monetization of alternative health. International Journal of Communication, 18, 1202-1224. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21128
Nieves-Cuervo, G., Manrique-Hernández, E., Robledo-Colonia, A, & Grillo, A. (2021). Infodemia: noticias falsas y tendencias de mortalidad por COVID-19 en seis países de América Latina. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 45, e44. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.44
Nuwarda, R. F., Ramzan, I., Weekes, L., & Kayser, V. (2022). Vaccine hesitancy: Contemporary issues and historical background. Vaccines, 10(10), 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101595
Ortiz-Sánchez, E., Velando-Soriano, A., Pradas-Hernández, L., Vargas-Román, K., Gómez-Urquiza, J. L., Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). Analysis of the anti-vaccine movement in social networks: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155394
Oliveira, I. S., Cardoso, L. S., Ferreira, I. G., Alexandre-Silva, G. M., Jacob, B. C. D. S., Cerni, F. A., Monteiro, W. M., Zottich, U., & Pucca, M. B. (2022). Anti-vaccination movements in the world and in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 55, e05922021. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0592-2021
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2017). How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public: Best practice guidance. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/343301
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2020, 11 de diciembre). Call for action: Managing the infodemic. https://www.who.int/news/item/11-12-2020-call-for-action-managing-the-infodemic
Paz Díaz, E., & Ricaurte, P. (2024). Coherencia narrativa y desinformación: el caso de grupos antivacunas en América Latina. Dixit, 38, e4014. https://doi.org/10.22235/d.v38.4014
Phillips, W. (2018). The oxygen of amplification: Better practices for reporting on extremists, antagonists, and manipulators. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/library/oxygen-of-amplification
Pierri, F., Perry, B. L., DeVerna, M. R., Yang. K.-C., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Bryden, J. (2022). Online misinformation is linked to early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal. Scientific Reports, 12, 5966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10070-w
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications.
Pino Uribe, J. F., Castiblanco Briceño, M. E., Zukin Cantor, P. V., & Melo Viasús, J. D. (2024). #EcuadorBajoAtaque: desorden informativo y la difusión de emociones negativas en X durante la crisis de seguridad en 2024. Dixit, 38, e4094.
https://doi.org/10.22235/d.v38.4094
Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2023). The propagation of misinformation in social media: A cross-platform analysis. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.1231864
Rodríguez-Orejuela, A., Montes-Mora, C. L., & Osorio-Andrade, C. F. (2022). Sentimientos hacia la vacunación contra la COVID-19: panorama colombiano en Twitter. Palabra Clave, 25(1), e2514. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2022.25.1.4
Salaverría, R., Buslón, N., López-Pan, F., León, B., López-Goñi, I., & Erviti, M. C. (2020). Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la COVID-19. Profesional de la Información, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.15
Smith, R., Cubbon, S., & Wardle, C. (2020). Under the surface: COVID-19 vaccine narratives, misinformation & data deficits on social media. First Draft.
Sorell, T., & Butler, J. (2022). The politics of COVID vaccine hesitancy and opposition. The Political Quarterly, 93(2), 347-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13134
Tarullo, R., & Gamir-Ríos, J. (2022). Asustar para desestabilizar: desinformación sobre la COVID-19 en Argentina y España. Cuadernos.info, (52), 47-68.
https://revistachilenadederecho.uc.cl/index.php/cdi/article/view/42915
Theocharis, Y., Cardenal, A., Jin, S., Aalberg, T., Hopmann, D. N., Strömbäck, J., Castro, L., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., De Vreese, C., Corbu, N., Koc-Michalska, K., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Sheafer, T., Splendore, S., Stanyer, J., Stępińska, A., & Štětka, V. (2023). Does the platform matter? Social media and COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3412-3437.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045666
Vaca, C. P., Páez, A., Romero, D. Z., & Gómez, L. M. (2024). Un desafío de confianza: narrativas predominantes en torno al proceso de vacunación contra COVID-19 en la ciudad de Bogotá. Dixit, 38, e4097. https://doi.org/10.22235/d.v38.4097
Varis, P. (2016). Digital ethnography. En A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 55-68). Routledge.
Wardle, C. (2019). First draft’s essential guide to understanding information disorder. First Draft. https://www.firstdraftnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Information_Disorder_Digital_AW.pdf?x76701referencia
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All of the works published are licensed under a CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution license. (updated on March 1st 2021)
The content of the journal may be shared in any material or format. The content may be adapted, contributed upon and transformed. Both possibilities are only permitted in so far as they complete the following conditions:
- Attribution: Credit must be given where it is due, a link to the license must be provided and changes, if made, must be indicated. This should be done in the manner deemed appropriate, without suggesting that the licensor promotes you or your use of the material.
Ownership rights
The patrimonial rights for Contratexto are published under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 license, allowing authors to keep the patrimonial rights to their work without restrictions.
If a work published in Contratexto were to be copied, distributed, spread, or any other activities contemplated in the aforementioned license, the author(s) and the journal must be mentioned visibly and expressly.
Self-archive
This journal allows and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
