Training the Algorithm: Governance, Agency, and Literacy in the Use of YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2022.n037.5331Keywords:
YouTube, algorithms, users, digital literacy, transmedia literacyAbstract
This study addresses the experiences of young Mexican users with YouTube’s recommendation algorithms. It seeks to determine if they are subordinated to algorithmic governance or if, on the contrary, they are capable of developing some tactics to resist algorithmic power through their agency. It uses a qualitative methodology based on focus groups and shows that users are not entirely subordinated to the platforms. Their possibilities of agency vary depending on the different technological appropriations of the platform, the intuitive theories about the ways in which these operate, the ability to dodge algorithmic distortions, and the resources to evaluate the quality of the information offered. As a result, the study identifies the specific skills that constitute algorithmic literacy.
Downloads
References
Alvarado, O., Heuer, H., Vanden Abeele, V., Breiter, A., & Verbert, K. (2020). Middle-aged video consumers’ beliefs about algorithmic recommendations on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), artículo 121. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415192
Alvarado, O., & Waern, A. (2018). Towards algorithmic experience: initial efforts for social media contexts. En Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173860
Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). How people use rich pictures to help them think and act. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(4), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9236-x
Bishop, S. (2019). Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society, 21(11-12), 2589-2606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819854731
Bruns, A. (2008). The future is user-led: the path towards widespread produsage. Fibreculture Journal, 11. http://eleven.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-066-the-future-is-user-led-the-path-towards-widespread-produsage/
Bucher, T. (2018). If… Then: algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube. Online video and participatory culture. Polity Press.
César, A. (2017, 25 de octubre). Cada minuto suben 8 horas de video a YouTube en México. El Financiero. https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/tech/cada-minuto-suben-horas-de-video-a-youtube-en-mexico/
Croucher, S. M., & Cronn-Mills, D. (2018). Understanding communication research methods (2.a ed.). Routledge.
Cruz Sánchez, I. (2019). Literacidad transmedial. Habilidades para vivir en el siglo XXI. En L. M. Garay Cruz & D. Hernández Gutiérrez (Coords.), Alfabetizaciones digitales críticas (pp. 105-128). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Lerma; Juan Pablos Editor.
Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., Kennedy, R., Behan, A., De Paor, A., Felzmann, H., Haklay, M., Khoo, S.-M., Morison, J., Murphy, M. H., O’Brolchain, N., Schafer, B., & Shankar, K. (2017). Algorithmic governance: developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554
Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and their others: algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128
Garay Cruz, L. M., & Hernández Gutiérrez, D. (2019). Introducción. En L. M. Garay Cruz & D. Hernández Gutiérrez (Coords.), Alfabetizaciones digitales críticas (pp. 9-21). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Lerma; Juan Pablos Editor.
Gelman, S. A., & Legare, C. H. (2011). Concepts and folk theories. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145822
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. En T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167-193). MIT Press.
Hernández y Hernández, D., Salado Rodríguez, L., & López González, R. (2019). Reflexiones sobre la literacidad: un punto de partida hacia lo digital. En L. M. Garay Cruz & D. Hernández Gutiérrez (Coords.), Alfabetizaciones digitales críticas (pp. 25-48). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Lerma; Juan Pablos Editor.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet. Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.
Kaiser, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2020). Birds of a feather get recommended together: algorithmic homophily in YouTube’s channel recommendations in the United States and Germany. Social Media + Society, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969914
Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2019). The ethical algorithm. The science of socially aware algorithm design. Oxford University Press.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
Lugo Rodríguez, N. L. (2016). Diseño de narrativas transmedia para la transalfabetización [Tesis doctoral, Universitat Pompeu Fabra]. TDX. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/396131
Lukoff, K., Lyngs, U., Zade, H., Liao, J. V., Choi, J., Fan, K., Munson, S. A., & Hiniker, A. (2021). How the design of YouTube influences user sense of agency. En Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445467
Pariser, E. (2014). The filter bubble. How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin Books.
Pasquale, P. (2016). The black box society. The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1989). The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and sociology of technology might benefit each other. En W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 17-30). MIT Press.
Ridley, M., & Pawlick-Potts, D. (2021). Algorithmic literacy and the role for libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963
Rieder, B. (2020). Engines of order. Amsterdam University Press.
Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence, 24(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736982
Roberge, J., & Seyfert, R. (2018). What are algorithmic cultures? En R. Seyfert & J. Roberge (Eds.), Algorithmic cultures. Essays on meaning, performance and new technologies (pp. 13-37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658698-7
Scolari, C. (2016). Estrategias de aprendizaje informal y competencias mediáticas en la nueva ecología de la comunicación. Revista Telos, 103. https://telos.fundaciontelefonica.com/archivo/numero103/estrategias-de-aprendizaje-informal-y-competencias-mediaticas-en-la-nueva-ecologia-de-la-comunicacion/
Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104
Siles, I., Segura-Castillo, A., Solís, R., & Sancho, M. (2020). Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: enacting data assemblages in the global South. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377
Silge J., & Robinson D. (2016). tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 1(3), 37. DOI: 10.21105/joss.00037
Statista. (2021). YouTube penetration in selected countries and territories 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1219589/youtube-penetration-worldwide-by-country/
Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism. Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge.
Tufekci, Z. (2018, 10 de marzo). YouTube, the great radicalizer. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/10/opinion/sunday/youtube-politics-radical.html
Vega, F. (2021). El Estado de social media en América Latina. Comscore. https://www.comscore.com/lat/Prensa-y-Eventos/Presentaciones-y-libros-blancos/2021/El-Estado-de-Social-Media-en-America-Latina
Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2021). Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, 24(4), 523-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
We Are Social. (2020, 30 de enero). Digital 2020: el uso de las redes sociales abarca casi la mitad de la población mundial. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020
YT Brandcast México. (2020, 23 de noviembre). YouTube Brandcast 2020 México [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xNbuFnpPbA
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All of the works published are licensed under a CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution license. (updated on March 1st 2021)
The content of the journal may be shared in any material or format. The content may be adapted, contributed upon and transformed. Both possibilities are only permitted in so far as they complete the following conditions:
- Attribution: Credit must be given where it is due, a link to the license must be provided and changes, if made, must be indicated. This should be done in the manner deemed appropriate, without suggesting that the licensor promotes you or your use of the material.
Ownership rights
The patrimonial rights for Contratexto are published under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 license, allowing authors to keep the patrimonial rights to their work without restrictions.
If a work published in Contratexto were to be copied, distributed, spread, or any other activities contemplated in the aforementioned license, the author(s) and the journal must be mentioned visibly and expressly.
Self-archive
This journal allows and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
