Peripheral placemaking: insurgent urban epistemology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/limaq2026.n017.8470Keywords:
urban co-production, insurgent epistemology, peripheriesAbstract
This paper proposes the concept of peripheral placemaking as an insurgent urban epistemology, grounded in space-production practices that emerge from the favela. Based on the study of Heliópolis (São Paulo), it is argued that the periphery is not merely an object of state intervention, but a territory capable of generating its own theories, methodologies, and rationalities. Local initiatives–self-management of public spaces, distributed learning, co-production of the commons, urban prototyping, and institutionalized networks–reveal that making the city implies producing situated knowledge. The analysis shows that the favela shifts the paradigm from prescriptive urbanism to a use-based urbanism, where learning, deciding, and building are inseparable processes. More than participation, it implies a redistribution of agency and a reconfiguration of the urban imaginary. It concludes that peripheral
Downloads
References
Baccarelli Heliópolis. (s. f.). Heliópolis. Conheça o poder transformador da educaçao e da cultura. https://baccarelli.org.br/nucleos/heliopolis/
Brazil Foundation. (s. f.). CUFA – Central Única das Favelas. https://brazilfoundation.org/project/cufa-central-unica-das-favelas/
Cine Favela. (s. f.). O poder do cinema que inspira, educa e transforma. https://cinefavela.org.br/
Central Única das Favelas. (s. f.). Sitio institucional de Central Única das Favelas (Projeto na Brazil Foundation). https://brazilfoundation.org/project/cufa-central-unica-das-favelas/
Dias, T. Y. J. T., Gatti, D., & Dias, K. T. (2019). No quebrar das pélvis: um estudo da relação corpo-espaço para a criação de uma performance em grupo. Revista dos Trabalhos de Iniciação Científica da UNICAMP, (26). https://doi.org/10.20396/revpibic2620181262
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Frediani, A. A., & Cociña, C. (2019). ‘Participation as planning’: Strategies from the South to challenge the limits of planning. Built Environment, 45(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.45.2.143
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.
Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2022). V Censo demográfico 2022. Favelas e comunidades urbanas: resultados do universo. https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Censos/Censo_Demografico_2022/Favelas_e_comunidades_urbanas_Resultados_do_universo/Anexos/FavelasComunidadesUrbanas_Apresentacao_20250417.pdf
Lategan, L. G., & Cilliers, E. J. (2017). Considering planning approaches in the global south and learning from co-production in South Africa’s informal backyard sector. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 223, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC170211
Lefebvre, H. (2009). O direito à cidade. Centauro Editora.
Lefebvre, H. (2020). La producción del espacio. Capitán Swing Libros.
Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0
Mbaye, J., & Dinardi, C. (2018). Ins and outs of the cultural polis: Informality, culture and governance in the Global South. Urban Studies, 56(3), 578-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017744168
McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Wiley-Blackwell.
Noronha, N. S., Silva, A. L., & Barki, E. (2022). The sociospatial organization of favela. Cities, 126, 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103649
Prefeitura de São Paulo. (2010, 25 de mayo). Projeto Eco Vida Heliópolis é fonte de renda para a comunidade. https://prefeitura.sp.gov.br/web/comunicacao/w/noticias/115945
Prefeitura de São Paulo. (s. f.). Mapa digital da cidade de São Paulo. Geosampa. https://geosampa.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/PaginasPublicas/_SBC.aspx
Project for Public Spaces. (2007). What is placemaking?. https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking
Rodrigues, L. S. (2021). O necrobiopoder sobre o corpo vulnerabilizado no Conjunto Heliópolis: As dimensões da injustiça ambiental no gerenciamento de risco em áreas contaminadas na capital paulista. Ambientes. Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política, 3(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.48075/amb.v3i1.26746
Rolnik, R. (2019). Urban warfare: Housing under the empire of finance. Verso.
Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299
Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407-429. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/173743
Simone, A. (2018). Improvised lives: Rhythms of endurance in an urban south. Polity Press.
Trotta, R. (2024). Continuidade e periferia na companhia de teatro Heliópolis: entrevista com o diretor de teatro Miguel Rocha. Cadernos Do GIPE-CIT, (52), 230-249. https://doi.org/10.9771/cadgipecit.52.2024.62865
Vaz Filho, P. S. (2025). Cine Favela de Heliópolis e o cinema de periferia. Revista Internacional de Folkcomunicação, 23(50), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.5212/RIF.v.23.i50.0011
.jpg)
