Kant on architecture: beauty, function, and meaningn, and Meaning

Authors

  • Paul Guyer Brown University, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/limaq2025.n016.7658

Keywords:

architecture, concepts, content, free play, function, imagination

Abstract

There might seem to be a logical contradiction between Kant’s claim that aesthetic experience and judgment are independent of concepts and disinterested, on the one hand, and yet that “adherent beauty” is conditioned by concepts of function and that all fine art expresses aesthetic ideas, on the other. However, Kant’s theory of aesthetic experience as the free play of imagination and understanding resolves any logical tension among these ideas. Rather than a theoretical challenge, balancing the demands of beauty, function, and meaning is the real practical challenge of the arts—especially of architecture as an art.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batteux, C. (1770). Einschränkung der schönen Künste auf einen einzigen Grundsatz (J. A. Schlegel, Trans.). Weidmanns Erben und Reich.

Batteux, C. (2015). The fine arts reduced to a single principle (J. O. Young, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Frampton, K. (2002). Labour, work and architecture: Collected essays on architecture and design. Phaidon.

Guyer, P. (2005a). Free and adherent beauty: A modest proposal. In P. Guyer (Ed.), Values of beauty: Historical essays in aesthetics (pp. 129–140). Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from “Free and adherent beauty: A modest proposal,” 2002, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 42[4], 357–366, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.4.357)

Guyer, P. (2005b). The harmony of the faculties revisited. In P. Guyer (Ed.), Values of beauty: Historical essays in aesthetics (pp. 77–109). Cambridge University Press.

Guyer, P. (2021). A philosopher looks at architecture. Cambridge University Press.

Herman, B. (2021). The moral habitat. Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. (1900–). Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Georg Reimer.

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer, Ed.; P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1790)

Koller, S. (2015). The birth of ethics from the spirit of tectonics. [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. TU Delft Repository. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:4fa1eeed-40cc-4282-9a92-c79555aa6b35

Kristeller, P. O. (1952). The modern system of the arts: A study in the history of aesthetics (II). Journal of the History of Ideas, 13(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707724

Laugier, M.-A. (1977). An essay on architecture (W. & A. Hermann, Trans.). Hennessey & Ingalls. (Original work published 1753)

Sullivan, L. (1896). “The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered.:Lippincott’s Magazine. March, 1896. Pp. 403-9.

Published

2025-11-27

Issue

Section

Sección Temática

How to Cite

Guyer, P. (2025). Kant on architecture: beauty, function, and meaningn, and Meaning. Limaq, 016, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26439/limaq2025.n016.7658