The status of the theory and terminology of folk psychology and the future of scientific psychology

Authors

  • Ricardo Braun Universidad de Lima (Perú)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2006.n009.903

Keywords:

folk psychology, reductionism, eliminativism, scientific psychology

Abstract

This article discusses the origins and function of folk psychology and its assimilation in a future scientific psychology. The problems of reductionism in science and eliminativism in psychology are analyzed. The author defends a non-reductive materialism view of psychology and argues for a vindication of the status and role of folk psychology. In this article the unity of science thesis and reductionism are explored and questioned to conclude that taking as an example, the problem of micro-reductions in physics. It is proposed, in contrast, a pluralist standpoint whereby the autonomy and interrelation of the different levels of reality are maintained. The article defends the role of folk psychology, as a source of non-reductive explanations, in the growth of scientific psychology which can be understood in a proposal of two possible uses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blackburn, S. (1991). Losing your mind: physics, identity and folk burglar prevention. En: J. Greenwood (Ed.). The future of folk psychology: intentionality and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. (1980). Plasticity: conceptual and neuronal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3.

Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67-90.

Churchland, P. (1988). Matter and consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Davidson, D. (1970). Mental events. Reimpreso en (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Feyerabend, P. (1963). Materialism and the mind-body problem. Review of Metaphysics, 17.

Fodor, J. (1968). Psychological Explanation. Nueva York: Random House.

Fodor, J. (1998). Cognitive Science: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Fodor, J. (1974). Special Sciences, or The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. Synthese, 28, 77-115.

Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation: Rethinking The Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale.

Harris, H. & Schaffner, K. (1992). Molecular Genetics, Reductionism, and Disease Concepts in Psychiatry. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17, 127-153.

Kincaid, H. (1986). Reduction, Explanation and Individualism. Philosophy of Science, 53, 492-513.

Margolis, J. (1987). Science without unity: Reconciling the Human and Natural Sciences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. En D. Gentener & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 299- 324). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

McMullin, E. (1984). A Case for Scientific Realism. En: J. Leplin (Ed.). Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

Oppenheim, P. & Putnam, H. (1991). Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. En: R. Boyd, P. Gasper & J. D. Trout. The Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 403-427.

Popper, K. (1974). Scientific reduction and the Essential incompleteness of all science. En: F. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (Eds.). Studies in the Philosophy of biology. Londres: Macmillan

Ravenscroft, I. (2004). Folk psychology as a theory. En: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.plato.stanford.edu/ entries/folkpsych-theory/

Rohrlich, F. (1988). Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 295-312.

Rorty, R. (1970). In defense of eliminative materialism. Review of Metaphysics, 24. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Sarkar, S. (1992). Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. Synthese. 91, 167-194.

Scharf, D. (1989). Quantum Measurement and the Program for the Unity of Science. Philosophy of Science, 6, 601- 623.

Sellars, W. (1968). Science and metaphysics. Londres: Routledge.

Stich, S. (1985). From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: A Case against Belief. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Von Eckardt, B. (1994). Folk Psychology. En: S. Guttenplan (Ed.). A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind (pp. 300- 307). Oxford: Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2006-11-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The status of the theory and terminology of folk psychology and the future of scientific psychology. (2006). Persona, 9(009), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2006.n009.903