The Philosophical Rhombus of Management (PRM): A Conceptual Framework for Professional Updating in Administrative Sciences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/ddee2026.n009.8927

Keywords:

philosophy of management, professional updating, organizational epistemology, praxeology, managerial ontology

Abstract

Updating management training programs involves an epistemological problem due to a disconnection between the philosophical foundations of managerial knowledge and the current practices of adult training programs. This paper introduces the Philosophical Rhombus of Management (PRM), a conceptual model that presents four dimensions of the philosophy of management: ontology, epistemology, axiology, and praxeology. The main goal was to identify and integrate the research on the philosophy of management and the implications this philosophy holds for the continuing professional development of managers. A scoping study was conducted based on the original framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley, and the PRISMA-ScR extension. For this study, a systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, and Dialnet, and covered the years of 1990 to 2024. From 847 records, 32 studies were selected. The synthesis was organized in the dimensions of the model and identified four main theoretical approaches: the ontological turn in organizational theory; epistemologies of tacit and explicit knowledge; axiological approaches to leadership ethics; and praxeological theories of situated learning. The RFG incorporates all of the aforementioned approaches and uses them as design criteria. The model provides a starting point for moving beyond technical reductionism for updating programs and will require empirical validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, P. S., Forbes, L. C., & Willmott, H. (2007). Critical management studies. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 119-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559808

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188

Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/258718

Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2006). The relationship between individual and organizational learning: New evidence from managerial learning practices. Management Learning, 37(4), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606070220

Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and

interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021-1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/

017084069501600605

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann Educational Books.

Chia, R. (1997). Essai: Thirty years on: From organizational structures to the organization of thought. Organization Studies, 18(4), 685-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800406

Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135

Cunliffe, A. L. (2008). Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning, 39(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607087578

De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876

Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00773.x

Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual–collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608090875

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Grey, C., & Mitev, N. (1995). Management education: A polemic. Management Learning, 26(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050769502600105

Illeris, K. (2004). A model for learning in working life. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620410566405

Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600213001

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603252172

Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Mir, R., & Watson, A. (2000). Strategic management and the philosophy of science: The case for a constructivist methodology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 941-953. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094262?seq=1

Mir, R., & Watson, A. (2001). Critical realism and constructivism in strategy research: Toward a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1169-1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.200

Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/257453

Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602-620. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20868882

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14

Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Scoping reviews. En E. Aromataris, C. Lockwood, K. Porritt, B. Pilla & Z. Jordan (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-09

Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.7373679

Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. En E. Lander (Comp.), La colonialidad del saber. Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales (pp. 201-246). CLACSO.

Reynolds, M. (1998). Reflection and critical reflection in management learning. Management Learning, 29(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698292004

Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338-360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0183

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171106

Sturdy, A. (2004). The adoption of management ideas and practices: Theoretical perspectives and possibilities. Management Learning, 35(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604043023

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850

Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171104

Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280-321. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.280

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.

Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002

Willmott, H. (1994). Management education: Provocations to a debate. Management Learning, 25(1), 105-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507694251008

Published

2026-07-17

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Reyes Acevedo, J. E. (2026). The Philosophical Rhombus of Management (PRM): A Conceptual Framework for Professional Updating in Administrative Sciences. Desafíos: Economía Y Empresa, 009, 100-121. https://doi.org/10.26439/ddee2026.n009.8927