A Political Reform Process on the Verge of the Bicentennial of Peru’s Independence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/iusetpraxis2021.n052.5015Keywords:
democracy, imperfect democracy, institutional framework, political reform, reelection, incumbency, rule of lawAbstract
Our country currently faces the first political reform process in its history throughout the 21st century. Unlike its closest precedent (in the nineties), this process takes place under the rule of law, which in turn communes with the fragile Peruvian democracy that, strictly speaking, fits the prototype of imperfect Latin American democracy. With this reform, an improved institutional framework of our precarious political system is pursued. In this sense, we have experienced three reform waves from 2016 to 2020, out of which two have an institutional origin (work commissions created especially by the Parliament and the executive branch to deal with the reform) and one has a non-institutional origin (proposals for constitutional reforms presented by former President Martín Vizcarra in July 2018). However, there are still some doubts about the future application of the current political reform―if we take into account that the laws approved by the reform could not be applied either for the past 2020 Extraordinary Congressional Elections or for the next 2021 General Elections―and its process has not concluded to date. In this context, it is required to finish this political reform process and rethink some aspects concerning the need to maintain the prohibition on consecutive reelection of national and subnational authorities. Nevertheless, the possibility of allowing just one consecutive reelection is in the pipeline.
Downloads
References
Córdova, B., e Incio, J. (2013). La ventaja del incumbente en el ámbito subnacional: un análisis de las dos últimas elecciones municipales en Perú. Papeles Políticos, 18(2), 415-436. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/papel/v18n2/v18n2a02.pdf
Cruz, M., y Román, A. (2016). La democracia peruana: apreciaciones e hipótesis desde la escuela. Argumentos. Revista de Análisis y Crítica, 10(2), 49-58. Recuperado de https://argumentos-historico.iep.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CRUZROMAN_JULIO2016.pdf
Gómez Díaz de León, C. (2015). Sistema político y formas de gobierno. En Ciencia política: perspectiva multidisciplinaria (pp. 19-48). Ciudad de México: Tirant lo Blanch.
Huacasi, W. (6 de octubre del 2019). 84 % respalda disolución constitucional del Congreso. La República. Recuperado de https://larepublica.pe/politica/2019/10/06/cierredel-congreso-84-respalda-disolucion-constitucional-del-parlamento/
Levitsky, S. (2016). La precaria continuidad democrática peruana. Argumentos. Revista de Análisis y Crítica, 10(2), 27-34. Recuperado de https://argumentos-historico.iep.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/LEVITSKY_JULIO2016.pdf
Puertas Gómez, G. (1998). Democracia e instituciones de democracia semidirecta. Una aproximación teórico-conceptual. Justicia Electoral. Revista del Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, 11, 71-83. Recuperado de https://tecnologiaseducativas.te.gob.mx/RevistaElectoral/content/pdf/a-1998-02-011-071.pdf
Sosa Villagarcía, P. (2016). Los impulsos de la democracia peruana y sus variedades. Argumentos. Revista de Análisis y Crítica, 10(2), 41-48. Recuperado de https://argumentos-historico.iep.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/SOSA_JULIO2016-2.pdf
Valdés Zurita, L. (1997). Sistemas electorales y de partidos. Ciudad de México: Instituto Federal Electoral.
Velásquez Javier, V. A., Villalobos Campana, J. M., Hurtado Cruz, V. I., y Tello Alfaro, J. A. (2020). Manual para candidatos. Elecciones Generales 2021. Lima: Instituto Peruano de Derecho Electoral, Democracia y Gestión Pública.
Zovatto, D. (2011). Democracia y gobernabilidad en América Latina en el siglo xxi temprano. Ciudad de México: Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación.
