Collective schizophrenia? the role of Public Registry in corporate reorganizations in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/iusetpraxis2021.n053.5008Keywords:
corporate reorganization, effective date, right of opposition, corporate law, General Corporation LawAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the conflictive relationship between the General Corporation Law and the Public Registry, concerning the effective date of corporate reorganizations. The author examines the rationality of the procedure regulated by the rules and recommended by the doctrine, the rights and interests that are intended to be protected and the deficiencies and possible interpretations of the language of the regulation. At the end of this paper, the author includes suggestions for a possible reform of the law on mergers and spin-offs.
Downloads
References
Elías Laroza, E. (2015). Derecho societario peruano (2.ª ed.). Gaceta Jurídica.
Hansmann, H., y Kraakman, R. (2003). El rol esencial del derecho de las organizaciones. Thémis, 46, 15-45.
Hernández, J. (1997). Reorganización de sociedades: fusión y escisión. Ius et Veritas, 8(14), 27-36.
Real Academia Española. (s. f.). Supeditar. En Diccionario de la lengua española. Recuperado el 10 de noviembre del 2021 de https://dle.rae.es/supeditar
Resolución 155-2011-SUNARP-TR-T [Tribunal Registral]. 18 de marzo del 2011. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/155-2011-SUNARP-TR-T.pdf
Resolución 474-2020-SUNARP-TR-T [Tribunal Registral]. 12 de octubre del 2020. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/474-2020-SUNARP-TR-T.pdf
Ruiz de Castilla, F. (2017). Derecho tributario: temas básicos. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial.
Talledo, C., y Calle, J. (2020). Manual societario. Editorial Economía y Finanzas.
