Analysis of mobile applications for learning around electronics in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/interfases2025.n021.7924Keywords:
assessment needs, assessment tools, constructivism, educational innovation, mobile devices, self-regulated learningAbstract
The purpose of this research was to explore educational mobile applications of electronics in Spanish to identify those that favor the learning of university students, specifically from the Computer Engineering degree program at the UAEM Texcoco University Center. An evaluation instrument was developed based on technical and didactic criteria based on the constructivist model, prioritizing interactivity, usability, educational content and feedback. The methodology included a literature review on evaluation instruments and the use of mobile applications as self-directed learning tools. The applications were selected through an analysis of their performance. Data were obtained from university students who applied the instrument. It was identified that the application “Electrician’s Manual” was the best rated in its didactic properties with 9.33 points, “Electrodoc” was placed with the lowest score with 8.14. In the technical evaluation also “Electrician’s Manual” was the best rated with 9.08 points and ‘CircuitJam’ obtained the lowest score (6.94), however, it was identified that “CircuitJam” is a didactic game whose properties do not match the properties of non-playful PPPs, so it is necessary to develop specific evaluation instruments for serious games. Seven applications were also highlighted as the most effective, grouped into resource libraries, simulators and games. These tools showed potential to improve the understanding of complex electronics concepts, promoting active learning. The study includes recommendations for their integration in classrooms and suggests future research.
Downloads
References
Aliaño, Á. M., Duarte Hueros, A. M., Guzmán Franco, M. D., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Mobile learning in university contexts based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.317
Aparicio Gómez, O. Y. (2018). Las TIC como herramientas cognitivas. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, 11(1), 67-80. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=561059324005
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Cataldi, Z. (2000). Una metodología para el diseño, desarrollo y evaluación de software educativo [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de La Plata]. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata. https://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/4055
Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública. (2023). Radiografía de la juventud mexiquense. https://portalhcd.diputados.gob.mx/PortalWeb/Micrositios/cbe5ac81-008d-460d-8682-60ff10482aac.pdf
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Routledge.
Espinoza, N., Perdomo, B., & Flores, M. (2005). Criterios y pasos para la evaluación de software educativo [Ponencia]. IV Congreso Internacional Trujillano de Educación en Matemática y Física, Trujillo, Venezuela. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299285719_Criterios_y_pasos_para_la_evaluacion_de_software_educat
Gutiérrez Benítez, J. G., & Acuña Gamboa, L. A. (2022). Evaluación estandarizada de los aprendizajes: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa, (34), 321-351. https://doi.org/10.25009/cpue.v0i34.2800
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Henríquez Ritchie, P., Organista Sandoval, J., & Lavigne, G. (2013). Nuevos procesos de interactividad e interacción social: uso de smartphones por estudiantes y docentes universitarios. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 13(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v13i3.12039
Hsu, Y.-C., & Ching, Y.-H. (2015). A review of models and frameworks for designing mobile learning experiences and environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2V616
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2024). Encuesta nacional sobre disponibilidad y uso de tecnologías de la información en los hogares (ENDUTIH) 2023 [Comunicado de prensa]. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2024/ENDUTIH/ENDUTIH_23.pdf
ISO/IEC. (1991). Software product evaluation – Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use (ISO/IEC Standard No. 9126-1:2001). https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/22749/d293dbe1fea54b3e853dfc5a07549390/ISO-IEC-9126-1-2001.pdf
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluación del aprendizaje constructivista. Tecnología Educativa, 31(10), 28-33.
López Hernández, F. A., & Silva Pérez, M. M. (2016). Factores que inciden en la aceptación de los dispositivos móviles para el aprendizaje en educación superior. Estudios sobre Educación, 30, 175-195. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.30.175-195
Martínez, R. D., Montero, Y. H., Pedrosa, M. E., & Martín, E. Í. (s. f.). Sobre herramientas cognitivas y aprendizaje colaborativo. https://studylib.es/doc/545449/sobre-herramientas-cognitivas-y-aprendizaje-colaborativo
Miranda, J. A. (2024). ¿Qué sistemas operativos dominan México en 2024? Merca 2.0.
https://www.merca20.com/que-sistemas-operativos-dominan-mexico-en-2024/
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
Nielsen, J., & Loranger, H. (2007). Prioritizing web usability. Anaya Multimedia.
Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00028.x
Sharples, M. (2005). Learning as conversation: Transforming education in the mobile age. En Proceedings of Conference on Seeing, Understanding, Learning in the Mobile Age.
Smith, S. L., & Mosier, J. N. (1986). Guidelines for designing user interface software. The MITRE Corporation. https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DA308/MITRE(1986)smith-mosier.pdf
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2013). Directrices de política para el aprendizaje móvil. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219662
Unión Europea. (s. f.). Reglamento general de protección de datos. Your Europe. https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/dealing-with-customers/data-protection/data-protection-gdpr/index_es.htm
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). La mente en sociedad: el desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Harvard University Press. https://saberespsi.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/vygostki-el-desarrollo-de-los-procesos-psicolc3b3gicos-superiores.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Last updated 03/05/21
