About the Journal

Peruvian Journal of Management

Peruvian Journal of Management (PJM) is the diamond open access scientific journal of the Graduate School of the Universidad de Lima, peer reviewed and published biannually. The first issue covers April to September and is published in April. The second issue, from October to March, is published in October. However, individual manuscripts that successfully pass the peer review process (from the second issue onwards) are published in the continuous publication mode. Articles in continuous publication can be cited using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI). The journal accepts submissions in both, Spanish and English, and is published in print (ISSN) and electronic (e-ISSN) versions. The PJM follows the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practices in Academic Publication (DOAJ).

 

INDEX

1. Aim & Scope
  1.1 Coverage
  1.2 Types of manuscripts
2. Mission, Vision, Objective
  2.1 Mission
  2.2 Vision
  2.3 Objective
3. Financing model
4. Periodicity and frequency of publication
5. Open science
  5.1 Open access and adherence to good principles
  5.2 Open data
  5.3 Preprints
     5.3.1 Preprints policy
6. Peer Review Policy
    6.1 Considerations for reviewers about this process
       6.1.1 Know the guidelines of the Journal
       6.1.2 Review process
       6.1.3 Writing the review
7. Code of Ethics & Scientific misconducts
  7.1 Code of Ethics of the Journal
  7.2 Considerations for authors
  7.3 Considerations for editors
  7.4 Considerations for reviewers
  7.5 Scientific misconducts
8. Digital preservation policy for the document
9. Code of Ethics References

 

1. AIM & SCOPE

The PJM disseminates scientific articles in areas such as administration, economics, accounting, organizational management and related disciplines. It is aimed at national and international authors interested in the theory and practice of these disciplinary fields.

1.1. Coverage: coverage includes, but is not limited to:

  • Management
  • Strategy
  • Organizations
  • Marketing
  • Management of Human resources
  • Finance
  • Economic Sciences
  • Accounting
  • Management information systems
  • Innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Operations and quality management
  • Supply chain management
  • Hospitality and tourism
  • Shipments and logistics
  • Business law
  • Organizational communication
  • Taxation and fiscal policy

1.2. Types of manuscripts:The journal accepts original articles and reviews.

a) Original articles (aspects to consider in the Methodology chapter)

- Quantitative approach: The methodology should have at least the following points: (i) Research design, (ii) Population or sample and unit of analysis, (iii) Data collection techniques and instruments, and (iv) Data analysis processing and ethical considerations.

- Qualitative approach: The following aspects should be considered: (i) Research design, (ii) Participants (inclusion and exclusion criteria, number, sample selection criteria), (iii) Instruments, (iv) Data collection and analysis procedure, and (v) Ethical, quality, and potential bias considerations.

- Bibliometric/scientiometric approach: Aspects to consider: (i) Source(s) of information and data collection (if it is a bibliometric study at the disciplinary level or research field, explain the equation/search chain and use the PRISMA flowchart to explain the selection process (inclusion/exclusion) of the final documents or records), (ii) Treatment, data analysis and table of dimensions and indicators.

- Articles on business law, taxation, and fiscal policy: Research articles are accepted, and their structure should follow criteria according to the scope and design of the study.

b) Review articles

The following types of review articles are accepted: scoping review, narrative review, systematic review, literature mapping review, or state-of-the-art review. Each author must follow the format specified for the type of review. However, for systematic and scoping reviews, the PRISMA diagram must be used and the equation or search string used for document retrieval must be included. The following article provides an overview of most types of reviews: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

In addition, for articles with bibliometric methodology that have a thematic or disciplinary focus, the PRISMA flowchart must be included.

 

2. MISSION, VISION, OBJECTIVE

2.1 MISSION

To be a solid and enriching link between theory and practice in the field of management and related disciplines. We promote cutting-edge scientific research and its effective application to achieve organizational excellence.

2.2. VISION

Our vision is to be a beacon of excellence and leadership in the dissemination of scientific knowledge. We aim to inspire organizational decision-making grounded in science for the development of effective, innovative, and sustainable strategies.

2.3 OBJECTIVE

Promote critical reflection and progress in areas such as administration, economics, accounting, organizational management, and related disciplines by providing a research environment that fosters rigorous methodologies and offers practical solutions to current organizational challenges.

 

3. FINANCING MODEL

PJM is edited and published by Universidad de Lima and operates under the diamond open access model. This means that full access to the articles does not incur any cost for both authors and readers of the journal.

 

4. PERIODICITY AND FREQUENCY OF PUBLICATION

The PJM journal has a semiannual frequency. The first issue covers the months from January to June and is published in January. The second issue covers July to December and is published in July. However, starting from the second issue, individual manuscripts that successfully pass the peer-review process are published in a continuous publication mode with their respective DOI.

 

5. OPEN SCIENCE

5.1 OPEN ACCESS AND ADHERENCE TO GOOD PRINCIPLES
The journal is a diamond open access, following the recommendations of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) and the principles of the Leiden Manifesto, which promote responsible and transparent use of metrics for evaluation, highlighting their limitations and warning against inappropriate use. In addition, we adhere to the principles of the Coalition for the Advancement of Research Evaluation (CoARA), aiming to foster transparent evaluation practices that properly recognize and value diverse contributions to research. Aligned with these commitments, the journal strives to promote a research culture that encourages, supports, and values the quality, integrity, and positive impact of research.

5.2 OPEN DATA

PJM actively promotes open data and research data management. This initiative aims to enhance transparency, data sharing, and result verification, in addition to strengthening scientific research by fostering collaboration and the reuse of previous research, thereby promoting diversity in analysis and opinions.

Furthermore, it aims to strengthen scientific research by encouraging collaboration and the reuse of previous research, thus promoting diversity of analysis and opinions.

Authors are requested to deposit their research data in their institutional data repositories or in global repositories such as Zenodo, Figshare, Dataverse Project, Dryad, among others. Authors who deposit the dataset in specialized repositories are asked to provide the link in the Methodology section of the article. In the presence of limitations, legal or ethical issues, authors should indicate the reasons and how access to the data.

Authors affiliated with the University of Lima will have the possibility of depositing their research data in the university's repository. To do this, you must contact the email repositorioul@ulima.edu.pe to obtain the registration form and follow the procedure.

Examples for citing Open Data from the APA Publications Manual 4th edition (2021, chapter 10.9):

  • In-text citation example 

    Parenthetical citations: (D’Souza & Wiseheart, 2018; National Center for Education Statics, 2016; Pew Research Center, 2018)
    Narrative citations: D’Souza y Wiseheart (2018), National Center for Education Statistic (2016) y Paw Research Center (2018)

  • Example of citing open data in the reference list

    D’Souza, A., & Wiseheart, M (2018). Cognitive effects of music and dance training in children (ICPSR 37080; Version V1) [Data set]. ICPSR. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37080.v1

    National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Fast Responde Survey System (FRSS): Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools, 2009 (ICPSR 35531; Version V3) [Dataset and codebook]. National Archive of Data on Arts and Culture. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35531.v3

    Pew Research Center (2018). American trends panel Wave 26 [Data set]. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/dataset/american-trends-panel-wave-26/

5.3 PREPRINTS

The journal is firmly committed to the dissemination and promotion of scientific research. Therefore, it supports authors who wish to share their manuscripts in preprint repositories. This action is make with the strong belief that by sharing their findings at an early stage, authors can contribute to the advancement of knowledge quickly and collaboratively.

5.3.1 PREPRINT POLICY

The PJM Journal encourages authors to submit their work in preprint format. Preprints are scientific manuscripts that are uploaded to a repository or preprint server by the author without formal peer review. The preprint is the final version of the manuscript that is often submitted to a journal for peer review.

Preprints should be deposited in recognized, public, and accessible preprint servers such as Scielo Preprints, SSRN by Elsevier, and SocArXiv. These three repositories were chosen due to their credibility and focus on the Social Sciences. If authors want to use another server, they may consult and submit their request to the journal's email at pjm@ulima.edu.pe. This will ensure that the content is accessible, provides versioning options, and includes links to the record of published articles in a journal.

The preprints may apply to the journal only if they have a permanent identification, such as a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). The journal suggests that authors license their preprints under Creative Commons. Similarly, PJM allows and encourages the citation of preprints. To do so, it should be mentioned in the citation that it is a preprint and include a DOI. The citation should also include information about the document version.

Examples for citing Preprints from the APA Publications Manual 4th edition (2021, chapter 10.8):

  • In-text citation example
    Parenthetical citations: (Leuker et al., 2018; Stults-Kolehmainen & Sinha, 2015)
    Narrative citations: Leuker et al. (2018) y Stults-Kolehmainen y Sinha (2015)
  • Example of citing preprints in the reference list
    Leuker, C., Samartzidis, L., Hertwig, R., Pleskac, T. J. (2018). When money talks: Judging risk and coercion in high-paying clinical trials. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSFJO/9P7CB
    Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Sinha, R. (2018). The effects of stress on physical activity and exercise. PubMed Central. https://www.ncbi.nlm.hih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894304 

The authors identity is known since the manuscripts will be available in a preprint repository. That is why the evaluation of the article will be through single-blind peer review. In other words, the authors will not know the reviewers' identities, but the reviewers will know the authors identities. If the article is later accepted for publication in the journal, the preprint and the article will be linked when the document is online.

If there are any questions or inquiries regarding this process, authors can communicate with the journal via email at pjm@ulima.edu.pe.

 

6. PEER REVIEW POLICY

The journal has a double-blind peer review process. This process is explained in detail in the "Editorial Process for Manuscript Evaluation and Dissemination Plan", section of the Guidelines for Authors.

External reviewers consider the following guidelines, which are described below:

6.1 Considerations for reviewers about this process

6.1.1 Know the guidelines of the journal

Reviewers should be familiar with the review guidelines provided by the journal. In case of any doubts, they can contact the editor at pjm@ulima.edu.pe. 

6.1.2 Review process

Overview of the article and contribution: In this initial reading, the reviewers aim to obtain first impressions and a general understanding of the article, always based on the most recent research in the area. Reviewers will ensure that the article aligns with the journal's purpose and primarily identify the impact it may have on the research discipline.

Reading: Reviewers conduct a detailed reading of the article with the goal of obtaining a comprehensive and objective evaluation. During this review, reviewers will consider the following aspects of the article:

  1. The article's contribution to the discipline.
  2. Academic rigor and precision.
  3. The style and structure of the article.

6.1.3 Writing the review

The journal provides a review form (download) for the reviewers. This form indicates the aspects that a quality article must have. The review will guide the editor and indicate one of the four possible decisions:

  1. Accept this submission (without modifications)
  2. Minor Revisions requested
  3. Resubmit for peer review (new round) / Major Revisions requested
  4. Rejected

 

7. CODE OF ETHICS & SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCTS

7.1 CODE OF ETHICS OF THE JOURNAL

The Universidad de Lima is committed to the integrity of all scientific articles it publishes. The value of the university's academic publications is based on the ethical behavior of the editorial team and all people involved.

The ethical guidelines of PJM Journal adhere to the principles of "transparency and good practices in academic publishing," established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the “principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” (DOAJ), as well as the Singapore Declaration on Research Integrity. These guidelines ensure adherence to ethical standards and promote transparency at all stages of the publication process.

Integrity at all levels
PJM is committed to maintaining honesty throughout the entire process, from the reception of scientific articles to their publication. This principle of honesty applies to the entire team involved in the management of the journal, including editors, authors and reviewers. Similarly, this process is entirely impartial and objective, prioritizing the quality of research over the authors' origin. This commitment aims to maintain a quality standard in all published articles, in line with ethics and good scientific practices. The Journal seeks to ensure that the content is truthful, reliable and meets the required academic standards.

Editorial process

The editorial process of the journal is entirely impartial and objective, prioritizing the quality of the research.

Plagiarism

The journal is committed to publishing only original works that contribute novelty to the field of study, present valuable and replicable results, and have a validated and reliable methodology. In case of suspicion of plagiarism, the necessary investigations will be carried out, and if the misconduct is confirmed, the journal will prepare a report that will prevent the authors involved from sending future articles to the journal for a certain period due to the severity of this punishable action.

It is essential to maintain academic integrity and ensure the originality of the published works. Therefore, all received articles will undergo plagiarism detection using the Turnitin software, with a maximum allowable similarity of 10%.

Data protection and digital rights

All published articles are under to a Creative Commons BY 4.0. It is important to note that the journal will not, under any circumstances, use the articles and data provided by the authors for commercial or similar purposes.

Response to scientific misconducts

In the event of suspicion or identification of scientific misconducts, the journal will follow the guidelines established by COPE. If the misconduct is confirmed, immediate and necessary actions will be taken. In addition, PJM will ensure the protection of those who, in good faith, report such behaviors.

Transparency of decisions

The journal is committed to ensuring that all editorial decisions are transparently communicated to the authors and reviewers involved in the process. Additionally, clear explanations will be provided regarding cases of rejection.

Use of artificial intelligence

PJM adheres to COPE's declaration on the use of artificial intelligence.

Authors may use tools such as ChatGPT, however, it is important to mention that AI cannot replace the results of research or the authors own writing. The journal values the contribution of artificial intelligence in the research process, but it is essential to recognize that its implementation should complement and support the work of the authors, without replacing their essential contribution.

It is important to note that since AI can generate incorrect, incomplete, or biased content, authors are ultimately responsible for the provided content. 

Therefore, it is necessary for authors to declare the purpose and use of these tools. To do so, at the end of the article, before references, authors should make the following statement:

Declaración

To prepare this article, [name of tool] was used for the purpose of [reason for use]. As the author(s) I(we) assume full responsibility for the content published.

Should be mention that this statement does not apply to the use of basic tools such as grammar and spelling checkers, etc. It is important to emphasize that if there is nothing to declare, it is not necessary to include this statement.

Non-preference Policy

In case any member of the editorial committee wishes to publish their research article in the journal, PJM ensures the integrity of the peer-review process and transparency at all stages of publication. Therefore, we declared that members of the editorial committee will not receive any preferential treatment, and they will be subject to the same standards of quality, review, and waiting time as any other author.

7.2 CONSIDERATIONS FOR AUTHORS

Affiliations

The author's affiliation on the article must represent the institution or institutions at which the research was presented, conducted, supported, and/or approved. Additionally, authors should consider their institution's affiliation policy and contractual obligations before submitting their articles. The journal does not tolerate any type of fraud related to institutional memberships.

Integrity

Researchers must assume responsibility for ensuring the reliability and veracity of their research. This implies carrying out the research in an ethical and rigorous manner, being transparent in the presentation and communication of the results.

Adherence to research regulations

Authors must be aware of their responsibilities as researchers. Therefore, they must comply with regulations and policies related to research.

Authorship

Researchers have the responsibility to be diligent about their contributions in all their publications and ensure that they do not infringe the legal rights of other authors. The names of the authors included in the articles must correspond only to those who meet the authorship criteria established by the ICMJE.

  • You can refer to the following document to learn more about it: Limaymanta, C. H (15 set, 2023). ¿Eres autor de un artículo científico? ¡Combate los vicios de autoría! Sociedad Científica de Bibliometría y Cienciometría (SCBC) https://www.ssbibliometrics.com/post/eres-autor-de-un-artículo-científico-combate-los-vicios-de-autoría.  

Recognition and Acknowledgment in Publications

Researchers should express gratitude or acknowledge in their publications the names and roles of people who have made significant contributions to the research, including sponsors and others who do not meet the authorship criteria.

Conflict of Interests

Researchers have an obligation to disclose any kind of conflicts of interest, whether personal, financial, intellectual, professional, or of any other nature, that may compromise the reliability of their work at all stages of the review process and acceptance of their manuscript.

Reporting of Irresponsible Research Practices

All authors of a research study are responsible for the content they publish. Therefore, if there is even the slightest suspicion of any misconduct in the research, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or other irresponsible behavior that compromises the reliability of the study, the editors of the journal(s) that may be affected and the relevant research authorities will be expressly informed. In addition, it is the responsibility of the authors themselves to report any possible malpractice if they suspect it.

Social Considerations

Authors have a responsibility and ethical obligation to society because their research contributes valuable and beneficial knowledge. It is important for them to do their work ethically and responsibly, considering the social impact of their studies and communicating their results in an accessible manner for the benefit of the society.

7.3 CONSIDERATIONS FOR EDITORS

Author as Top Priority
The journal is committed to authors because of the trust they placed in it. For this reason, the journal is guided by the principle of giving the the highest priority to authors and their research. This is reflected in the commitment of the reviewers and editors for punctuality and objectivity. These commitments by reviewers and editors primarily aim to ensure that authors' manuscripts are treated fairly and efficiently. The aim is to provide authors with a review and publication process that meets quality standards and is completed within a reasonable period of time.

Conflict of Interest
Editors must not use privileged information for personal gain, such as the unauthorized use of data or ideas presented in articles for their own research or publications, nor for the benefit of third parties. This commitment guarantees the confidentiality and integrity of the review process and contributes to maintaining trust in the scientific publishing system.
If the editors want to publish in the journal, they must declare any potential or actual conflict of interest that may arise. In these cases, the number of documents in each issue with affiliation from the editor's institution should not exceed 20%.

Reporting Irresponsible Research Practices
The journal is committed to integrity and good research practices. Therefore, editors have the responsibility to immediately report any suspicion or acknowledgment of misconduct in research articles to the editorial team of the journal. This will allow immediate and appropriate actions to address irregularities and maintain the quality and reliability of the publication.

Objectivity in Decision-Making
The editors are committed to ensuring the selection of specialized and qualified reviewers using the best criteria. This selection will be accomplished fairly and objectively, with the aim of ensuring impartiality in decision-making.

Confidentiality
The editorial team is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of all information related to submitted articles, whether they progress to the next stages of evaluation or not. This means that they will not disclose any information that may identify the authors or reveal details about the articles without the explicit consent of the authors.

Non-preferential Treatment
The editors are firmly committed to managing the editorial workflow transparently and accurately, ensuring that no preferences of any kind are granted. This impartial approach ensures a fair process for all authors and contributes to maintaining the integrity and quality of our academic publications.

7.4 CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWERS

Professional Responsibility
All reviewers must be familiar with the journal's guidelines regarding the review processes and subsequent requirements in order to perform a proper work and achieve the best reviews. Reviewers are fully responsible for providing adequate justification for their decisions, whether positive or negative.

Conflict of Interest
Peer reviewers have the responsibility to declare and disclose to the PJM Journal any potential conflicts of interest of a personal, financial, intellectual, professional, political, or religious nature that may influence their reviews (Master et al., 2018).

Personal conflicts of interest arise when an individual's personal interests, such as their personal relationships, emotions, personal gain, and resentments, may influence their judgment or decisions. Financial conflicts of interest arise when reviewers have financial interests in companies, organizations, or projects related to the work they are reviewing. This could include investments, sponsorships, or financial agreements that could influence their judgment of the article. Intellectual conflicts of interest occur when reviewers have academic, theoretical, or methodological preferences that could bias their judgment, as well as entrenched beliefs or professional loyalties. Professional conflicts of interest arise when reviewers have work or institutional affiliations that could influence their review, especially if they are at institutions that compete with any of the article's authors or could favor their decisions. Political conflicts of interest occur when political affiliations, ideologies, or loyalties influence reviewers' decisions regarding articles. Religious interests can also interfere with decisions, especially on ethical or moral issues such as abortion or contraception.

It is important for reviewers to be transparent and disclose any relationship or situation that could compromise their impartiality or have an impact on the objective evaluation of the manuscript. In case of doubt, they should immediately contact the PJM.

According to the National Code of Scientific Integrity (Concytec, 2024), the following situations are considered conflicts of interest:

  • To have collaborated regularly on scientific research activities or publications with any of the researchers responsible for the proposal to be evaluated within the last three years.
  • To be employed at any of the institutions where the study to be evaluated was conducted.
  • To have had an advisor or mentor relationship within the last three years with any of the participants in the proposal to be evaluated.
  • To have a personal, family, or contractual relationship with any of the researchers responsible for or collaborating on the proposal to be evaluated.
  • To have a commercial or financial interest (for or against) in the development of the proposal to be evaluated.
  • To have any type of relationship with a researcher responsible for the proposal that could compromise the impartiality of the evaluation.

Confirmation of Participation 
Reviewers are committed to responding to invitations for peer review within a reasonable period, even if they are unable to do the review process. It is understandable that a reviewer may have time limitations or circumstances preventing them from accepting a review. For this reason, it is important that they respond to the review request and communicate their availability. Additionally, if a reviewer is already participating in a review process and, for any reason, cannot complete it, it is essential to immediately communicate with the journal editor at pjm@ulima.edu.pe.

Privacy Policy for the Review Process 
Reviewers have the commitment and responsibility to respect the confidentiality of the peer review process. This implies that they must maintain the privacy and confidentiality of the documents and information to which they have access during the review process. Additionally, reviewers must refrain from using any information obtained in the process for their own benefit, for others, or with the purpose of harming or discrediting others.

Impartiality
Reviewers must ensure that their decisions are not influenced by considerations related to the nationality, religion, political beliefs, gender, or any other characteristic of the authors of the manuscript. In the double-blind peer review process, if the reviewers suspect the identity of the author, they must notify the journal about it, along with any potential conflict of interest.

Ethical Commitment in Research
Reviewers are responsible for immediately notifying and reporting to the PJM Journal any ethical irregularities, malpractice, or procedures that contravene scientific integrity in the reviewed research or in relation to its publication.

7.5 SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCTS
The journal does not tolerate any kind of scientific misconduct. In case of suspected or confirmed irregularities in the article, appropriate measures will be taken in accordance with the guidelines set by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).

For further information, please refer to:

Algunos ejemplos de malas prácticas que combate la PJM son:

Some examples of scientific misconducts that PJM combats are:

  1. Scientific fraud
  2. Plagiarism
  3. Paper mills
  4. Conflicts of interest
  5. Salami publishing or Salami slicing
  6. Inbreeding in publications
  7. Manipulation and trade of authorship
  8. Exaggerating academic and scientific achievements on a CV or website
  9. Expanding the bibliographic references of a publication to increase the number of citations
  10. Forced citations
  11. Delaying the work of another researcher or thesis student
  12. Deceiving the public by presenting distorted information
  13. Publishing already published works
  14. Among others

 

8. DIGITAL PRESERVATION POLICY FOR THE DOCUMENT

The content of the journal is stored on the servers of the Universidad de Lima, where periodic backup copies are made to ensure the content is sheltered. In this way, PJM allows the preservation and availability of the journal's contents for future generations. Additionally, the journal has LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe), a program developed by the Stanford University Library that provides open-source technologies and services for secure and reliable digital preservation. This also ensures the preservation and availability of the journal's contents.

 

9. CODE OF ETHICS REFERENCES

American Psychological Association. (2021). Manual de publicaciones de la APA. México: Editorial El Manual Moderno.

Committee on Publication Ethics COPE (s.f.). Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English). https://publicationethics.org/node/19886

Committee on Publication Ethics COPE (s.f.). Guidance. https://publicationethics.org/guidance

COPE (s.f). Authorship and AI tools. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

COPE Council. COPE Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers — English. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9

COPE Council. Ethics toolkit for a successful editorial office: A COPE Guide — English. https://doi.org/10.24318/AkFpEBd1

World Conferences on Research Integrity (s.f.). Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. https://www.singaporestatement.org/

Resolución de Presidencia N.° 028-2024-CONCYTEC-P. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica (7 de marzo de 2024). https://www.gob.pe/institucion/concytec/normas-legales/5323788-028-2024-concytec-p

Master, Z., Werner, K., Smith, E., Resnik, D. B., & Williams-Jones, B. (2018). Conflicts of interest policies for authors, peer reviewers, and editors of bioethics journals. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 9(3), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2018.1510859

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                                                   Last Update: April 29th, 2024