La Teoría de Orientación a la Meta, estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de secundaria de Lima
Resumen
En la presente investigación se ha empleado la Teoría de Orientación a la Meta para estudiar el rol que tiene la motivación de los estudiantes en el contexto educativo en una muestra de 1.505 estudiantes de secundaria de Lima. En esta investigación se estudiaron tres tipos de metas: orientadas al aprendizaje, de aproximación al rendimiento y de evitación al rendimiento. La evidencia empírica proviene básicamente de estudios realizados con muestras de estudiantes norteamericanos de clase media. Por lo tanto nuestro objetivo fue encontrar si estos hallazgos eran también válidos en una muestra de estudiantes peruanos, para lo cual examinamos la relación entre la Orientación a la Meta de los estudiantes, las estrategias de aprendizaje y el rendimiento académico.
Descargas
Citas
Al-Emadi, A. A. (2001). The relationships among achievement, goal orientation, and study strategies. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 823-832.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
Barron, K. E. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: A multiple goals approach. En: C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. Nueva York: Academic Press.
Beltrán, J. A. (1996). Procesos, estrategias y técnicas de aprendizaje. Madrid: Síntesis.
Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1(2), 100-112.
Botsas, G. & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 477-495.
Bouffard, T.; Boisvert, J.; Vezeau, C. & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317-329.
Bouffard, T.; Vezeau, C. & Bordeleau, L. (1998). A developmental study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students’ self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 309-319.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Elliot, A. J., & Moller, A. C. (2003). Performance-approach goals: good or bad forms of regulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 339-356.
Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
Harackiewicz, J. M.; Barron, K. E. & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1-21.
Harackiewicz, J. M.; Barron, E. B.; Pintrich, P. R.; Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638-645.
Harackiewicz, J. M.; Barron, K. E.; Tauer, J. M.; Carter, S. M. & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316-330.
Heyman, G. D. & Dweck, C. S. (1992). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Their relation and their role in adaptive motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 231- 247.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (2001). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the Simplis command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (2002). Adolescents’ achievement goals. En: F. Pajares, & T. Urdan. Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 125-167), Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Linnenbrink, E. & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition. En: C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 195-227). Nueva York: Academic Press.
Maehr, M. L. (2000). Transforming school cultures to enhance student motivation and learning. Paper for a talk to teachers and principals in Leuven, Belgium (May).
Maehr, M. L. & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder: Westview Press.
Matos, L. (2005). School culture, teachers’ and students’ achievement goals as communicating vessels. A study in Peruvian secondary schools. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad de Lovaina, Bélgica. [en línea].
Meece, J. L.; Blumenfeld, P. C. & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514-523.
Meece, J. L.; Herman, P. & McCombs, B. L. (2003). Relations of learner centered teaching practices to adolescents’ achievement goals. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4-5), 457-476.
Middleton, M. & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710-718.
Midgley, C.; Maehr, M. L.; Hruda, L. Z.; Anderman, E.; Anderman, L.; Freeman, K. E. et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.
Midgley, C.; Maehr, M. L.; Hicks, L.; Roeser, R.; Urdan, T.; Anderman, E. et al. (1997). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.
Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61-75.
Midgley, C.; Kaplan, A.; Middleton, M.; Maehr, M. L.; Urdan, T.; Anderman, L. H.; Anderman, E. & Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of the scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Students as educational theorists. En: D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.). Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 267-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Patrick, H.; Anderman, L. H.; Ryan, A. M.; Edelin, K. C. & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 35-58.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. En: D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.). Student perceptions in the classrooms (pp. 149-183). Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and application (2. a edición). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. En: D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.). Student perceptions in the classrooms (pp. 149-183). Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P. R.; Smith, D. A. F.; Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.
Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (2. a edición). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Van Kraayenoord, C. E. & Schneider, W. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(3), 305-324.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250.
Wolters, C. A.; Yu, S. L. & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. En: D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.). Selfregulation of learning and performance (pp. 3-21). Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
La aceptación de publicación implica ceder los derechos de impresión y de reproducción por cualquier forma y medio al editor.