Technological capabilities and competitive advantages, bibliometric analysis
Abstract
The research focuses on a systematic review of the scientific production on “Technological Capabilities as Competitive Advantages”. It uses a methodology based on a bibliometric study of international databases such as Scielo, Redalyc, Dialnet and DOAJ. The results reveal that this area is relatively young but growing in importance. It is noteworthy that most of the researchers come from Mexico and Spain, reflecting a particular interest in these regions. Seven different approaches are identified, demonstrating diversity in research perspectives, and tools such as VOSviewer and Excel are used for rigorous and scientific analysis.
Downloads
References
Al-Mamun, A., Muhammad, N. M. N., & Ismail, M. B. (2017). Absorptive capacity, innovativeness and the performance of micro-enterprises in Malaysia. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 21(3), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262917716729
Benavent, R. A., Sánchez, J. G., Ferrandis, M. T., & Piñero, J. L. (1995). Análisis del consumo de información en la revista Anales Españoles de Pediatría. Anales de Pediatría, 43(6), 399-406. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rafael-Aleixandre-Benavent/publication/283960450_Analysis_of_the_consumption_of_information_in_the_journal_Anales_Espanoles_de_Pediatria/links/568ab4ea08aebccc4e1a16c5/Analysis-of-the-consumption-of-information-in-the-journal-AnalesEspanoles-de-Pediatria.pdf
Beske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: a critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026
Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of business research, 67(1), 2891-2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
Chica-Urzola, H., Escobar-Córdoba, F., & Eslava-Schmalbach, J. (2007). Validación de la Escala de omnolencia de Epworth. Revista de Salud Pública, 9(4), 558-567. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/422/42219060008.pdf
Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0201-7
De Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/pric91844
Estabrooks, C. A., Winther, C., & Derksen, L. (2004). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nursing research, 53(5), 293-303. https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/abstract/2004/09000/mapping_the_field__a_bibliometric_analysis_of_the.3.aspx
Estévez-Torres, M. A., Megna-Alicio, D. A., & Toranzo-Rodríguez, I. L. (2021). Análisis de la gestión del talento en las universidades a nivel. Revista Electrónica Innovación Tecnológica, 27(2). https://www.academia.edu/81763205/Análisis_de_la_gestión_del_talento_en_las_universidades_a_nivel_mundial
González de Dios, J. G., Moya, M., & Mateos Hernández, M. A. (1997). Indicadores bibliométricos: características y limitaciones en el análisis de la actividad científica. An Esp Pediatr, 47(3), 235-244. https://www.aeped.es/sites/default/files/anales/47-3-3.pdf
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F
Liu, L., Dai, D., Gao, S., Xu, D. X., & He, S. (2013). Polarization management for silicon photonic integrated circuits. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 7(3), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201200023
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203
Manzano, V., & Andreu, J. (2000). Formatos para ítems en las encuestas electrónicas. Antecedentes y propuestas. Metodología de Encuestas, 2(1), 61-101. https://hdl.handle.net/11441/96586
Osorio Barreto, D., Cardona Arenas, C. D., & Naranjo Herrera, C. G. (2021). Sanjaya Lall: la competitividad industrial y las capacidades tecnológicas. Apuntes del CENES, 40(71), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v40.n71.2021.10659
Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of operations management, 26(6), 730-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.001
Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Flynn, B. B. (2010). Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 721-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00294.x
Yang, Y., Yang, J., Yan, J., Liao, S., Yi, D., & Li, S. Z. (2014, 6-12 de setiembre). Salient color names for person re-identification. En D. Fleet, T. Pajdla, B. Schiele & T. Tuytelaars (Eds.), Computer Vision–ECCV 2014 (pp. 536-551). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_35
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 147-150. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011052
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.