Effects of Different Environments on Interactions Among University Students: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2025.n2.8061Keywords:
Systematic review, interaction environments , mediation , socio-cognitive interactions, university studentsAbstract
As technology-mediated environments become increasingly prevalent in educational settings, understanding their impact on student interactions during learning processes is vital. Despite the growing integration of technology in education, there remains a significant gap regarding systematic reviews comparing various educational environments. Our research focused on conducting a systematic review of the effects of different settings on university students’ interactions. A comprehensive analysis of quasi-experimental and experimental studies was carried out to understand how mediated and non-mediated environments influence student learning interactions, with particular emphasis on academic and non-academic tasks. Following a meticulous selection process, we identified 16 pertinent articles. The findings revealed significant differences in interaction dynamics based on the type of environment utilized and demonstrated that, while the nature of the tasks did not significantly modify interaction patterns, the choice of environment played a crucial role in shaping these dynamics. In conclusion, this study underscores the necessity of carefully considering the unique advantages and challenges presented by both mediated and non-mediated environments in educational curriculum design. Integrating these insights into curriculum development may enable educators to more effectively tailor educational experiences that enhance student interaction and foster deeper learning. This approach is critical for maximizing the potential benefits of educational technologies and creating more engaging and effective learning environments.
Downloads
References
Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015
Alzahrani, F. K. J., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2022). Benefits and challenges of using gamification across distance learning platforms at higher education: A systematic review of research studies published during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(10), 1948-1977. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/13543
Baccon, L. A., Chiarovano, E., & MacDougall, H. G. (2019). Virtual reality for teletherapy: Avatars may combine the benefits of face-to-face communication with the anonymity of online text-based communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(2), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0247
Cabrera Larreategui, S. Y., Rojas Yalta, E. M., Montenegro Torres, D., & López Regalado, O. (2021). El aula invertida en el aprendizaje de los estudiantes: Revisión sistemática. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 77, 152-168. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.77.1967
Castellaro, M., & Peralta, N. S. (2020). Pensar el conocimiento escolar desde el socioconstructivismo: Interacción, construcción y contexto. Perfiles Educativos, 42(168), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.168.59439
Cedeño Cedeño, R. J., Vásquez Castro, P. C., & Maldonado Palacios, I. A, (2023). Impacto de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) en el rendimiento académico: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Ciencia Latina Revista Multidisciplinar, 7(4), 10297-10316. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i4.7732
Drouin, M., Sprecher, S., Nicola, R., & Perkins, T. (2022). Is chatting with a sophisticated chatbot as good as chatting online or FTF with a stranger? Computers in Human Behavior, 128 Article 107100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107100
García Díaz, E., Padial Suárez, J. J., & Berrocal de Luna, E. (2021). Evaluación de las plataformas digitales más utilizadas durante la actual pandemia (Covid-19). Reidocrea, 10(30), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.70942
González Aldana, M. A., Perdomo Osorio, K. V., & Pascuas Rengifo, Y. (2017). Aplicación de las TIC en modelos educativos blended learning: Una revisión sistemática de literatura. Sophia, 13(1), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.18634/sophiaj.13v.1i.364
González Pérez, A., & Sosa Díaz, M. J. (2021). Aspectos pedagógicos, tecnológicos y de interacción social del aprendizaje móvil: Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39(1), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.469271
Gutiérrez Mendoza, U. P., & Rodríguez Rodríguez, G. E. (2023). Impacto de los entornos virtuales en el proceso educativo pre y post pandemia. Revista de Climatología, 23, 2455-2464. https://doi.org/10.59427/rcli/2023/v23cs.2455-2464
Herring, S. C. (1996). Introduction. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 1-12). Benjamins.
Jara Conohuillca, R. J. (2021). Pedagogical strategies with technology in the teaching of university academic writing: A systematic review. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 15(1), Article e1209. https://doi.org/10.19083/10.19083/ridu.2021.1209
Kessler, M., Polio, C., Xu, C., & Hao, X. (2020). The effects of oral discussion and text chat on L2 Chinese writing. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 666-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12491
Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
Leguizamón, R., Rondini, M., Castellaro, M., & Peralta, N. S. (2020). Clasificación y descripción de sistemas categoriales sobre interacción sociocognitiva entre pares. Propósitos y Representaciones 8(2), Article e556. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n2.556
Liao, J. (2018). The impact of face-to-face oral discussion and online text-chat on L2 Chinese writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.06.005
Lin, G.-Y. (2019). Scripts and mastery goal orientation in face-to-face versus computer-mediated collaborative learning: Influence on performance, affective and motivational outcomes, and social ability. Computers & Education, 143, Article 103691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103691
Lundin, M., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018). Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: A systematic review of flipped classroom research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0101-6
Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021). Between level up and game over: A systematic literature review of gamification in education. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042247
Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Hernández, R. M., Ocaña-Fernández, Y., & Khabir, M. (2022). Synchronous CMC text chat versus synchronous CMC voice chat: Impacts on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and anxiety. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(4), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1906362
Pellas, N., & Mystakidis, S. (2020). A systematic review of research about game-based learning in virtual worlds. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 26(8), 1017-1042. https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.2020.054
Peralta, N. S., Castellaro, M., Tuzinkievicz, M. A., & Curcio, J. M. (2023). Argumentación en jóvenes universitarios: Revisión de investigaciones realizadas desde el socioconstructivismo. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 21(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.21.2.5783
Pham, H. T. P. (2022). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2112-2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530
Prieto Andreu, J. M. (2020). Una revisión sistemática sobre gamificación, motivación y aprendizaje en universitarios. Teoría de la Educación, 32(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.20625
Roos, C. A., Postmes, T., & Koudenburg, N. (2020). The microdynamics of social regulation: Comparing the navigation of disagreements in text-based online and face-to-face discussions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(6), 902-917. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220935989
Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student–group interactions in a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.003
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028
Tang, X. (2019). The effects of task modality on L2 Chinese learners’ pragmatic development: Computer-mediated written chat vs. face-to-face oral chat. System, 80. 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.011
Thi Thai, N. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2019). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423
Vendityaningtyas, V., & Styati, E. W. (2018). Effect of computer-mediated communication and face-to-face communication on the students’ writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(3), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i3.4235
Verba, M. (1994). The beginnings of collaboration in peer interaction. Human Development, 37(3), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278249
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weiser, O., Blau, I., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2018). How do medium naturalness, teaching-learning interactions and students’ personality traits affect participation in synchronous E-learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.001
Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: Comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
Zabala-Vargas, S. A., Ardila-Segovia, D. A., García-Mora, L. H., & Benito-Crosetti, B. L. (2020). Aprendizaje Basado en Juegos (GBL) aplicado a la enseñanza de la matemática en educación superior. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Formación Universitaria, 13(1), 13-26. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000100013
Zeinali Nejad, M., Golshan, M., & Naeimi, A. (2021). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on learners’ pronunciation achievement. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), Article 1872908. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1872908
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acceptance for publication implies the transfer of printing and reproduction rights, by any form and means, to the publisher, while the author retains the intellectual property of the article.
