Proceedings without hearings in international commercial arbitration

Authors

  • Julio César Betancourt London Arbitration Programme, Oxford, Reino Unido

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/iusetpraxis2022.n054.5277

Keywords:

COVID-19, international commercial arbitration, arbitral proceedings, hearings, documents-only arbitration

Abstract

In international commercial arbitration, hearings allow the arbitral tribunal to listen to each party’s arguments. At hearings, each party may also call witnesses and experts. Neither the UNCITRAL Model Law nor the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules provide expressly for the right to a hearing, meaning that de lege data there is no such right. Thus, the decision on whether or not to hold a hearing rests primarily with the parties or, depending on the case, with the arbitral tribunal. The arbitration community’s response to COVID-19 has stressed substituting face-to-face hearings with virtual hearings. Yet the question of whether such hearings are (or are not) necessary remains largely overlooked. This article examines the idea of arbitral proceedings without hearings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Julio César Betancourt , London Arbitration Programme, Oxford, Reino Unido

    Abogado y magíster en Derecho por la University College London. Doctor en Derecho Privado por la Universidad de Salamanca; asimismo, fue director del Departamento de Investigaciones del Chartered Institute of Arbitrators y junior academic visitor en la Universidad de Oxford. Profesor del Curso Superior de Arbitraje de la Universidad CEU San Pablo y autor de varias publicaciones en materia de negociación, mediación y arbitraje, incluyendo la obra titulada El contrato de arbitraje internacional (Tirant lo Blanch, 2022).

References

Annan, K. (1999). The 1958 New York Convention as a model for subsequent legislative texts on arbitration. Arbitration International, 15(3).

Born, G. B. (2021). International commercial arbitration (3.a ed., vol. 3). Kluwer Law International.

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. (2011). CIArb costs of international arbitration survey. CIArb.

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. (2016). Documents-only arbitration procedures. CIArb.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Arbitration Rules. (2015). CIETAC arbitration rules. www.cietac.org

Comisión de las Naciones Unidas para el Derecho Mercantil Internacional. (2011). Reglamento de arbitraje de la CNUDMI (revisado en 2010). Naciones Unidas.

Comisión de las Naciones Unidas para el Derecho Mercantil Internacional. (2018). Ley Modelo de la CNUDMI sobre Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, 1985, con enmiendas adoptadas en 2006. Naciones Unidas.

Convención sobre el Reconocimiento y la Ejecución de las Sentencias Arbitrales Extranjeras de 1958. Artículo V(1)(e). (1958, 10 de junio).

Hodges, P. (2012). Drive for efficiency and the risks for procedural neutrality — Another tale of the hare and the tortoise? Dispute Resolution International, (6).

Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre. (2018). HKIAC administered arbitration rules. www.hkiac.org

International Chamber of Commerce. (2018). Conducción eficaz del arbitraje: una guía para abogados internos y para otros representantes de las partes. Imprimerie Port Royal.

International Chamber of Commerce. (2021). ICC arbitration rules. http://www.iccwbo.org/

London Court of International Arbitration. (2015). LCIA releases costs and duration data. https://www.lcia.org/LCIA/reports.aspx

London Court of International Arbitration. (2020). LCIA arbitration rules. www.lcia.org

Prague Rules. (2018). Reglas sobre la tramitación eficiente de los procedimientos en el arbitraje. www.praguerules.com

Queen Mary University of London y White & Case. (2021). International arbitration survey: adapting arbitration to a changing world. http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/

Sentencia [2008] EWHC 2273 (Ch). (2008, 29 de septiembre). Corte de Inglaterra y Gales (EWHC).

Sentencia 659. (1990, 21 de febrero). Corte de Alemania (Oberlandesgericht Naumburg).

Sentencia T 6238-10. (2012, 24 de febrero). Corte de Apelaciones de Suecia (Svea Court of Appeal).

Singapore International Arbitration Centre. (2016). SIAC rules. www.siac.org.sg

Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. (2017). Reglamento de arbitrajes simplificados de la SCC. www.sccinstitute.com

Waincymer, J. M. (2012). Procedure and evidence in international arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

World Health Organization. (s. f.). Timeline: WHO’s COVID-19 response. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#!

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

Betancourt, J. C. (2016). El contrato de arbitraje internacional. Tirant lo Blanch.

Betancourt, J. C. (2019). What are the arbitral tribunal’s powers in default proceedings? Journal of International Arbitration, 36(4).

Betancourt, J. C. (2021a). El impacto del COVID-19 sobre el arbitraje comercial

internacional. En T. J. Aliste Santos & A. A. Garcia Júnior (Coords.), Transformación del paradigma de justicia tras la pandemia COVID-19 (pp. 499-522). Atelier.

Betancourt, J. C. (2021b). Some reflections on the impact of COVID-19 on international commercial arbitration. American Review of International Arbitration, 32(1).

Betancourt, J. C., Hardy, T., Nesbitt, S., & Klaas, P. (2016). International arbitration guidelines: safe ports for arbitral storms. The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 82(2).

Binder, P. (2019). International commercial arbitration and mediation in UNCITRAL Model Law jurisdictions. Kluwer Law International.

Bishop, D., & Kehoe, E. G. (2010). The art of advocacy in international arbitration. Juris Publishing.

Blackaby N., Partasides, C., Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (2015). Redfern and hunter on international arbitration. Oxford University Press.

British Broadcasting Corporation. (s. f.). Covid map: coronavirus cases, deaths, vaccinations by country. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-51235105

Collett, M. (2013). Maritime arbitration. En J. D. M. Lew, H. Bor, G. Fullelove & J. Greenaway, J. (Eds.), Arbitration in England with chapters on Scotland and Ireland (pp. 145-158). Kluwer Law International.

Geisinger, E., & Tattevin, G. (2013). Advocacy in international commercial arbitration. Juris Publishing.

Goodman, A. (2012). Effective written advocacy. A guide for practitioners. Wildy, Simmonds & Hill.

Holtzmann, H. M., Neuhaus, J. E., Kristjánsdóttir, E., & Walsh, T. W. (2015). A guide to the 2006 amendments to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

International Centre for Dispute Resolution. (2014). International dispute resolution procedures (including mediation and arbitration rules). https://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/ICDR_Rules.pdf

Lévy, L., & Polkinghorne, M. (2017). Expedited procedures in international arbitration, dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law (vol. 16). International Chamber of Commerce.

Lew, J., Mistelis, L., & Kröll, S. (2003). Comparative international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

Paulsson, J., & Petrochilos, G. (2017). UNCITRAL arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

Scherer, M., Bassiri, N., & Abdel Wahab, M. S. (2020). International arbitration and the COVID-19 revolution. Kluwer Law International.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2013). A guide to UNCITRAL: basic facts about the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. United Nations.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2016). UNCITRAL Secretariat Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958). United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Proceedings without hearings in international commercial arbitration. (2022). Ius Et Praxis, 54(054), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.26439/iusetpraxis2022.n054.5277