A step back: rethinking the usefulness and effects of escalation clauses in international arbitration

Authors

  • Marcial Giovanni Gutierrez Lucar Universidad de Lima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2025.n44.8205

Keywords:

Clause, staggered, negotiation, requirement, arbitration

Abstract

In this paper you will find the identification of the main disadvantages of agreeing to a staggered arbitration clause, as well as the tools available to us in international arbitration so that the arbitration phase is not avoided. Likewise, there are proposals to take into consideration when agreeing these clauses, in order to promote that the parties settle their disputes instead of having a third party do it. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Marcial Giovanni Gutierrez Lucar, Universidad de Lima

    Abogado y Máster en Derecho por la Universidad de Lima.
    Estudios de posgrado en arbitraje por la Universite de Geneve, el Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement y el Washington College of Law del American University – Washington D.C., así como de civil patrimonial por la Universidad de Salamanca.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-22

Issue

Section

Especial

How to Cite

A step back: rethinking the usefulness and effects of escalation clauses in international arbitration. (2025). Advocatus, 044, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2025.n44.8205