Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2022.n042.5766

Keywords:

same-sex marriage, right to equality and non-discrimination, homoaffective family, amparo process, right to marriage

Abstract

The following work focuses on making an analysis on the against votes of the magistrates that dismissed the amparo process presented by Oscar Ugarteche, who pretended the Peruvian National Registry of Identification and Civil Status — RENIEC to register his marriage certificate, which took place in Mexico and was legally performed there, whilst not pretending the Peruvian State to recognize the legality of same-sex marriage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Vanessa Elizabeth Shinno Pereyra, Universidad de Lima

    Abogada por la Universidad de Lima. Maestría en Derecho Civil con mención en Derecho de Familia por la
    Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón. Doctoranda en Derecho por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Profesora de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas y de la Universidad Continental. 

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

Issue

No. 042 (2022)

Section

Misceláneas

How to Cite

Analysis of Plenary Accord N° 676/2020: the dismissal of Oscar Ugarteche’s homosexual marriage lawsuit. (2022). Advocatus, 042, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2022.n042.5766