Definiendo el concepto del Incremento Material del Riesgo en la relación de causalidad: ¿podría aplicarse en el Derecho peruano?

Authors

  • Ricardo Canepa Casillas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2019.n038.4893

Keywords:

law of negligence, torts, liability, damages, material increase in risk, material contribution to harm, evidentiary gaps, causation, adequate cause, factual causation, common law, Peruvian law, but for, Wilsher, Bonnington, McGhee, Sienkiewicz, Barker, Fairchild, Cook, Summers, Litzinger, Clements

Abstract

Through this essay, the author attacks the issues behind the evidentiary gaps that prevent the finding of a causal link between the damage and the wrongdoer, particularly when these evidentiary gaps preclude the claimant from proving who, within a group of persons who have increased the risk of damage, actually caused it. As a solution, the author proposes that the “multiple tortfeasor exception”, which is an application of the “material increase in risk” developed in the common law, can be implemented in Peru thanks to the flexibility provided by the adequate cause (the Peruvian approach to causation). For these purposes, the lessons learned through the common law shall serve as guiding light.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ricardo Canepa Casillas

    Abogado por la Universidad de Lima. Máster en Derecho por la Universidad de Melbourne.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-06

Issue

Section

Especial

How to Cite

Definiendo el concepto del Incremento Material del Riesgo en la relación de causalidad: ¿podría aplicarse en el Derecho peruano?. (2020). Advocatus, 038, 89-119. https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2019.n038.4893