Encabezado de página

El estudio del desarrollo en niños pequeños a partir de dos dominios: comprensión de acciones y comprensión simbólica

Eva Jauck, Olga Alicia Peralta

Resumen


El objetivo del trabajo consiste en ilustrar una nueva forma de aproximación al estudio del desarrollo cognitivo a partir de investigaciones en dos dominios de conocimiento que han permanecido escindidos: la comprensión de acciones y la comprensión simbólica de imágenes. Primero, se muestran recientes investigaciones en niños pequeños sobre la comprensión de acciones a través de las acciones en vivo y las acciones en imágenes. Luego, se incluye la comprensión simbólica temprana tanto de imágenes en general como las provistas por una tablet. Por último, se presentan trabajos que han unido ambos caminos al estudiar la comprensión simbólica de imágenes que representan acciones, por parte de niños (desde dos años en adelante).

Palabras clave


dominio de conocimiento; comprensión simbólica: comprensión de acciones

Referencias


Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., y Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants Parse Dynamic Action. Child Development, 72(3), 708-7.

Barresi, J., y Moore, C. (1996). Intentional Relations and Social Understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107-154.

Blass, E. M., Fillion, T. J., Rochat, P., Hoffmeyer, L. B., y Metzger, M. A. (1989). Sensorimotor and Motivational Determinants of Hand-Mouth Coordination in 1-3-Day Old Human Infants. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 963-975.

Bloom, P., y Markson, L. (1998). Intention and Analogy in Children’s Naming of Pictorial Representations. Psychological Science, 9(3), 200-204.

Cannon, E., y Woodward, A. L. (marzo de 2010). Familiar Actions Trump “Action-Effects” in Goal Detection in the First Year. Trabajo presentado en la International Conference on Infant Studies. Baltimore, MD.

Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., y Moore, C. (1998). Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i-174.

Corbetta, D., Guan, Y., y Williams, J. L. (2012). Infant Eye-Tracking in the Context of Goal-Directed Actions. Infancy, 17(1), 102-125.

DeLoache, J. S. (1987). Rapid Change in the Symbolic Functioning of Very Young Children. Science, 238(4833), 1556-1557.

DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic Functioning in Very Young Children: Understanding of Pictures and Models. Child Development, 62(4), 736-752.

DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming Symbol-Minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 66-70.

DeLoache, J. S., y Burns, N. M. (1994). Early Understanding of the Representational Function of Pictures. Cognition, 52(2), 83-110.

DeLoache, J. S., Kolstad, V., y Anderson, K. N. (1991). Physical Similarity and Young Children’s Understanding of Scale Models. Child Development, 62(1), 111-126. 35 El estudio del desarrollo en niños pequeños

Falck-Ytter, T., Gredebäck, G., y Von Hofsten, C. (2006). Infants Predict other People’s Action Goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 878-879.

Flanagan, J. R., y Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action Plans Used in Action Observation. Nature, 424(6950), 769-771.

Gelman, S. A., y Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and Representational Status in Children’s Early Naming. Cognition, 66(2), B35-B47.

Gentner, D., y Markman, A. (1997). Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity. American Psychologist, 52, pp. 45-56.

Gentner, D., y Namy, L. L. (1999). Comparison in the Development of Categories. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 487-513.

Hamlin, J. K., Hallinan, E. V., y Woodward, A. L. (2008). Do As I Do: 7-Month-Old Infants Selectively Reproduce Others’ Goals. Developmental Science, 11(4), 487-494.

Harris, P. L., Kavanaugh, R. D., y Dowson, L. (1997). The Depiction of Imaginary Transformations: Early Comprehension of a Symbolic Function. Cognitive Development, 12(1), 1-19.

Hirschfeld, L., y Gelman, S. (2002). Hacia una topografía de la mente: introducción a la especificidad de dominio. En L. Hirschfeld y S. Gelman (Eds.), Cartografía de la mente. La especificidad de dominio en la cognición y en la cultura (pp. 23-67). Barcelona: Gedisa.

Hunnius, S., y Bekkering, H. (2014). What Are you Doing? How Active and Observational Experience Shape Infants’ Action Understanding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369(1644), 20130490.

Jovanovic, B., Király, I., Elsner, B., Gergely, G., Prinz, W., y Aschersleben, G. (2007). The Role of Effects for Infants’ Perception of Action Goals. Psychologia, 50(4), 273-290.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994). Más allá de la modularidad: La ciencia cognitiva desde la perspectiva del desarrollo. Madrid: Alianza.

Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., y Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual Statistical Learning in Infancy: Evidence for a Domain General Learning Mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35-B42.

Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., y Pempek, T. A. (2016). Toddlers’ Word Learning from Contingent and Noncontingent Video on Touch Screens. Child Development, 87(2), 405-413.

Lowenstein, J., y Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial Mapping in Preschoolers: Close Comparisons Facilitate Far Mappings. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2(2), 189-219.

Namy, L. L., y Gentner, D. (2002). Making a Silk Purse Out of Two Sow’s Ears: Young Children’s Use of Comparison in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 5.

Onishi, K. H., y Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255-258. 36 Eva Jauck / Olga Alicia Peralta

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International Universities Press.

Rochat, P. (2004). El mundo del bebé. Madrid: Morata.

Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., y Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype Me! Socially Contingent Interactions Help Toddlers Learn Language. Child Development, 85(3), 956-70.

Saylor, M. M., Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., y LaBounty, J. (2007). Infants’ on-Line Segmentation of Dynamic Human Action. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(1), 113-128.

Sheehan, K. J., y Uttal, D. H. (2016). Children’s Learning from Touch Screens: a Dual Representation Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.

Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Brown, E., y Hayes, R. (1999). Intermodal Perception at Birth: Intersensory Redundancy Guides Newborn Infants’ Learning Of Arbitrary Auditory-Visual Pairings. Developmental Science, 2(3), 333-338.

Stapel, J. C., Hunnius, S., van Elk, M., y Bekkering, H. (2010). Motor Activation During Observation of Unusual Versus Ordinary Actions in Infancy. Social Neuroscience, 5(5-6), 451-460.

Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. London: Karnac Books.

Tare, M., Chiong, C., Ganea, P., y DeLoache, J. (2010). Less Is More: How Manipulative Features Affect Children’s Learning from Picture Books. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 395-400.

Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Troseth, G. L., Russo, C. E., y Strouse, G. A. (2016). What’s Next for Research on Young Children’s Interactive Media? Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 54-62.

Uttal, D. H., O’Doherty, K., Newland, R., Hand, L. L., y DeLoache, J. (2009). Dual Representation and the Linking of Concrete and Symbolic Representations. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 156-159.

Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants Selectively Encode the Goal Object of an Actor’s Reach. Cognition, 69(1), 1-34.

Woodward, A. L., y Gerson, S. A. (2014). Mirroring and the Development of Action Understanding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B.: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130181.

Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, J., Gerson, S. A., Henderson, A. M. E., y Buresh, J. (2009). The Emergence of Intention Attribution in Infancy. En B. Ross (Ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 187-222). Waltham MA: Academic Press.


Texto completo: PDF

Citar:     Cite/Citar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



DOI: 10.26439/persona2019.n022(1).4081


ISSN: 1560-6139